Sasi Kumar Mukund vs Siddhant Banthia — Chisinau CH Qualifying Round 1

Chisinau CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
IND4
Sasi Kumar Mukund
1306ELO
1281Hard ELO
29 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 26 May 2025
hard
IND
Siddhant Banthia
#1169ATP
25 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLLL
Mukund S.
6-3 6-4
Banthia S.
Mukund S.
662
Banthia S.
340

Sasi Kumar Mukund defeated Siddhant Banthia 6-3 6-4 in the Chisinau CH qualifying round 1 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mukund S.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Banthia S.

Banthia S.serving75% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Mukund S.

Serve advantage — Mukund S.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mukund S.Banthia S.
1st serve in·Even
59%
55%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
69%
2nd serve points won·Clear edge
52%
38%
Service points won·Slight edge
62%
55%
Return points won·Even
35%
34%
Break points saved·Slight edge
57%
48%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.3
3.5
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.0
4.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (32 vs 10). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mukund S.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Banthia S.
3.1
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 98 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.8
Surface form
0.0
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
9.1
Minutes 14d
8.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Q2
Marmousez L.[2]
Arutiunian E.[8]
6-36-2
Hussey G.[3]
Jones B.[10]
6-47-62
Pieczkowski O.[7]
Jones M.[1]
6-26-2
Wendelken H.[6]
Papamalamis T.[11]
6-44-66-4
Parker S.[5]
Pieczonka F.[12]
6-46-2
Mukund S.[4]
Ramanathan R.[9]
4-67-626-4
Q1
Parker S.[5]
Tajima N.
6-11-0
Mukund S.[4]
Banthia S.
6-36-4
Pieczkowski O.[7]
Uta D.
6-36-2
Marmousez L.[2]
Eichenseher D.
6-26-4
Hussey G.[3]
Gorban A.
6-16-1
Jones M.[1]
Hands T.
6-43-66-3
Wendelken H.[6]
Salazar Martinez D.
6-16-1
Papamalamis T.[11]
Coman M.
6-16-4
Arutiunian E.[8]
Gautier A.
3-67-616-4
Pieczonka F.[12]
Pankin S.
3-67-637-5
Jones B.[10]
Honda N.
6-46-2
Ramanathan R.[9]
Ganta S.
6-46-4