Maya Joint vs Ann Li — Rabat Quarter-final

Rabat · WTA · Quarter-final
Maya Joint
AUS
Maya Joint
#87WTA
1659ELO
1611Clay ELO
$391kYTD
$1.7MCAREER
20 yrs · 167 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLWLWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 19 May 2025
clay
Ann Li
USA4
Ann Li
#29WTA
1807ELO
1743Clay ELO
$718kYTD
$3.8MCAREER
26 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWLWW
Joint M.
6-2 6-1
Li A.
Joint M.
662
Li A.
210

Maya Joint defeated Ann Li 6-2 6-1 in the Rabat quarter-final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Ann Li came in ranked #29, leading the head-to-head 1–0. Maya Joint claimed a first win over Ann Li in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-05-17StrasbourgR32clayAnn Li1-6 2-6

Serve vs return

This season
Joint M.serving67% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Li A.

Li A.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Joint M.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Joint M.Li A.
—
Serve
19
—
Return
19

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Joint M.Li A.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
61%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
46%
Service points won·Even
56%
58%
Return points won·Even
46%
43%
Break points saved·Slight edge
51%
56%
Aces / match·Dominant
1.4
4.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.3
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (85 vs 73). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Joint M.Li A.
Clutch Rating·Even
77
76
Break points saved·Slight edge
76
83
Break points won·Clear edge
99
87
Deciding sets·Slight edge
77
87
Tiebreaks·
—
66

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Joint M.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Li A.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.0Clay Elo 1611
Surface ELO
5.0+132 Clay Elo edge
4.5Overall Elo 1659
ELO gap
5.5Overall Elo 1807
10.0
H2H
0.0
6.0
Surface form
4.9
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.4
Minutes 14d
8.6
4.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Joint M.Li A.
Freshness·Slight edge
91
96

Joint M.: 9 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Li A.: 12 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
21°CMainly clear
Wind 18 km/hHumidity 57%

Draw

Final
Joint M.
Cristian J.
6-36-2
Semi-finals
Joint M.
Tomljanovic A.
6-40-0
Cristian J.
Osorio C.[2]
6-766-46-4
Quarter-finals
Cristian J.
Sevastova A.
6-36-4
Tomljanovic A.
Bouzas Maneiro J.[10]
6-16-3
Osorio C.[2]
Mateas M.
6-36-1
Joint M.
Li A.[4]
6-26-1
R16
Cristian J.
Bolsova A.
7-617-61
Bouzas Maneiro J.[10]
Nahimana S.
6-44-66-1
Tomljanovic A.
Pieri T.
4-66-26-4
Joint M.
Volynets K.[9]
6-06-3
Mateas M.
Rus A.
6-46-2
Li A.[4]
Baptiste H.
6-46-757-5
Osorio C.[2]
Rakhimova K.
4-66-26-3
Sevastova A.
Sonmez Z.
6-36-4
R32
Sevastova A.
Kabbaj Y.
5-76-47-5
Tomljanovic A.
Tomova V.[5]
7-54-66-3
Bolsova A.
Siniakova K.[6]
3-66-16-2
Bouzas Maneiro J.[10]
Grabher J.
6-31-66-4
Joint M.
Konjuh A.
7-56-2
Volynets K.[9]
Alves C.
6-36-0
Sonmez Z.
Bronzetti L.[3]
6-26-1
Li A.[4]
Timofeeva M.
7-666-2
Rus A.
Fossa Huergo N.
6-36-776-1
Cristian J.
Kotliar Y.
6-36-1
Nahimana S.
El Aouni A.
6-36-2
Baptiste H.
Rosatello C.
7-653-66-2
Osorio C.[2]
Cocciaretto E.
2-66-36-2
Pieri T.
Martinez Cirez C.
6-36-0
Mateas M.
Mandlik E.
6-36-4
Rakhimova K.
Teichmann J.
6-46-1