Nerman Fatic vs Nicolas Alvarez Varona — Skopje CH Round of 32

Skopje CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
BIH
Nerman Fatic
#396ATP
1496ELO
1478Clay ELO
31 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 19 May 2025
clay
ESP
Nicolas Alvarez Varona
#481ATP
1353ELO
1301Clay ELO
25 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWLL
Fatic N.
6-3 2-6 6-4
Alvarez Varona N.
Fatic N.
6262
Alvarez Varona N.
3641

Nerman Fatic defeated Nicolas Alvarez Varona 6-3 2-6 6-4 in the Skopje CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Nerman Fatic closed it out in three sets, 6–3 2–6 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Fatic N.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Alvarez Varona N.

Alvarez Varona N.serving68% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Fatic N.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Fatic N.Alvarez Varona N.
1st serve in·Even
63%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
47%
Service points won·Even
62%
61%
Return points won·Even
40%
40%
Break points saved·Even
58%
58%
Aces / match·Even
4.2
4.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.0
3.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (54 vs 48). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Fatic N.Alvarez Varona N.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
24
5
Break points saved·Clear edge
63
40
Break points won·Clear edge
36
17
Deciding sets·Slight edge
24
29
Tiebreaks·Dominant
35
1

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Fatic N.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Alvarez Varona N.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.6+177 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.4Clay Elo 1301
7.1Overall Elo 1496
ELO gap
2.9Overall Elo 1353
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.3
Surface form
4.5
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
6.7
Minutes 14d
5.2
7.0
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Clarke J.[3]
Fatic N.
6-26-3
Semi-finals
Fatic N.
Poljicak M.[8]
6-45-76-4
Clarke J.[3]
Dellien H.[1]
7-646-3
Quarter-finals
Poljicak M.[8]
Geerts M.
7-636-1
Fatic N.
Negritu C.
3-67-666-2
Dellien H.[1]
Michalski D.
6-26-1
Clarke J.[3]
Schwaerzler J.
6-36-1
R16
Clarke J.[3]
Cachin P.
6-46-4
Schwaerzler J.
Sharipov M.[6]
6-26-4
Geerts M.
Roca Batalla O.[4]
0-66-47-65
Negritu C.
Agamenone F.
6-44-66-1
Dellien H.[1]
Brunold M.
6-14-66-4
Poljicak M.[8]
Olivieri G.
7-56-3
Michalski D.
Denolly C.
6-16-2
Fatic N.
Durasovic V.[5]
6-36-4
R32
Schwaerzler J.
Bueno G.
6-46-3
Sharipov M.[6]
Milev Y.
7-56-3
Clarke J.[3]
Sels J.
6-36-2
Roca Batalla O.[4]
Oberleitner N.
6-726-36-4
Agamenone F.
Shelbayh A.
6-47-5
Geerts M.
Mrva M.
6-26-1
Poljicak M.[8]
Ivanovski K.
6-46-756-4
Brunold M.
Mikrut L.
6-36-4
Negritu C.
Dodig M.
6-14-66-4
Cachin P.
Dhamne M.
6-26-1
Fatic N.
Alvarez Varona N.
6-32-66-4
Dellien H.[1]
Kodat T.
6-46-3
Olivieri G.
Marmousez L.
6-43-66-1
Denolly C.
Budkov Kjaer N.
7-626-1
Michalski D.
Houkes M.[7]
7-644-67-68
Durasovic V.[5]
Travaglia S.
4-66-47-65