Nerman Fatic vs Mili Poljicak — Skopje CH Semi-final

Skopje CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
BIH
Nerman Fatic
#396ATP
1496ELO
1478Clay ELO
31 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 19 May 2025
clay
Mili Poljicak
CRO8
Mili Poljicak
#348ATP
1471ELO
1442Clay ELO
22 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLWWL
Fatic N.
6-4 5-7 6-4
Poljicak M.
Fatic N.
6562
Poljicak M.
4741

Nerman Fatic defeated Mili Poljicak 6-4 5-7 6-4 in the Skopje CH semi-final on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Nerman Fatic edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 5–7 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Fatic N.serving68% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Poljicak M.

Poljicak M.serving68% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Fatic N.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Fatic N.Poljicak M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
62%
61%
Return points won·Even
40%
41%
Break points saved·Even
58%
61%
Aces / match·Even
4.2
4.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.9
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (54 vs 56). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Fatic N.Poljicak M.
Clutch Rating·Even
24
23
Break points saved·Clear edge
63
77
Break points won·Dominant
36
7
Deciding sets·Slight edge
24
13
Tiebreaks·Dominant
35
69

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Fatic N.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
Poljicak M.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.1+37 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.9Clay Elo 1442
5.0Overall Elo 1496
ELO gap
5.0Overall Elo 1471
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
5.3
Surface form
6.1
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
6.7
Minutes 14d
3.7
7.0
3-set count
4.0
9.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Fatic N.Poljicak M.
Freshness·
—
80

Poljicak M.: 2 days rest · 1 match, 30 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Clarke J.[3]
Fatic N.
6-26-3
Semi-finals
Fatic N.
Poljicak M.[8]
6-45-76-4
Clarke J.[3]
Dellien H.[1]
7-646-3
Quarter-finals
Poljicak M.[8]
Geerts M.
7-636-1
Fatic N.
Negritu C.
3-67-666-2
Dellien H.[1]
Michalski D.
6-26-1
Clarke J.[3]
Schwaerzler J.
6-36-1
R16
Clarke J.[3]
Cachin P.
6-46-4
Schwaerzler J.
Sharipov M.[6]
6-26-4
Geerts M.
Roca Batalla O.[4]
0-66-47-65
Negritu C.
Agamenone F.
6-44-66-1
Dellien H.[1]
Brunold M.
6-14-66-4
Poljicak M.[8]
Olivieri G.
7-56-3
Michalski D.
Denolly C.
6-16-2
Fatic N.
Durasovic V.[5]
6-36-4
R32
Schwaerzler J.
Bueno G.
6-46-3
Sharipov M.[6]
Milev Y.
7-56-3
Clarke J.[3]
Sels J.
6-36-2
Roca Batalla O.[4]
Oberleitner N.
6-726-36-4
Agamenone F.
Shelbayh A.
6-47-5
Geerts M.
Mrva M.
6-26-1
Poljicak M.[8]
Ivanovski K.
6-46-756-4
Brunold M.
Mikrut L.
6-36-4
Negritu C.
Dodig M.
6-14-66-4
Cachin P.
Dhamne M.
6-26-1
Fatic N.
Alvarez Varona N.
6-32-66-4
Dellien H.[1]
Kodat T.
6-46-3
Olivieri G.
Marmousez L.
6-43-66-1
Denolly C.
Budkov Kjaer N.
7-626-1
Michalski D.
Houkes M.[7]
7-644-67-68
Durasovic V.[5]
Travaglia S.
4-66-47-65