Martin Damm vs Robert Strombachs — Tbilisi CH Round of 16

Tbilisi CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Martin Damm
USA
Martin Damm
#106ATP
1706ELO
1657Hard ELO
$338kYTD
$910kCAREER
22 yrs · 203 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 19 May 2025
hard
Robert Strombachs
LAT9
Robert Strombachs
#452ATP
1294ELO
1287Hard ELO
26 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWLWWL
Damm M.
6-1 6-3
Strombachs R.
Damm M.
662
Strombachs R.
130

Martin Damm defeated Robert Strombachs 6-1 6-3 in the Tbilisi CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Martin Damm came in ranked #106.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Damm M.serving92% hold

wins 72% of points on serve vs Strombachs R.

Strombachs R.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Damm M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Damm M.Strombachs R.
1st serve in·Even
62%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
80%
71%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
52%
47%
Service points won·Slight edge
69%
62%
Return points won·Even
33%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
12.9
4.5
Double faults / match·Even
4.1
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (73 vs 32). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Damm M.Strombachs R.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
26
2
Break points saved·Dominant
93
68
Break points won·Even
1
1
Deciding sets·Even
5
3
Tiebreaks·Dominant
84
9

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Damm M.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Strombachs R.
3.3
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 107 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
9.8+370 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.2Hard Elo 1287
10.0Overall Elo 1706
ELO gap
0.0Overall Elo 1294
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.9
Surface form
5.9
0.0Lost last 10
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Damm M.Strombachs R.
Freshness·Even
89
89

Damm M.: 10 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Strombachs R.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 35 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Purtseladze S.[4]
Cina F.[8]
7-656-4
Semi-finals
Purtseladze S.[4]
Damm M.
7-56-747-67
Cina F.[8]
Broom C.
6-26-757-65
Quarter-finals
Damm M.
Loffhagen G.
W/O
Cina F.[8]
Coulibaly E.[3]
6-47-64
Purtseladze S.[4]
Glinka D.
7-655-77-610
Broom C.
Pokorny L.
3-66-46-0
R16
Purtseladze S.[4]
Fomin S.
6-37-64
Glinka D.
Searle H.
7-646-3
Damm M.
Strombachs R.[9]
6-16-3
Coulibaly E.[3]
Bax F.
6-26-747-61
Cina F.[8]
Snitari I.
6-17-5
Loffhagen G.
Simakin I.[2]
6-47-5
Broom C.
Chidekh C.
6-33-66-4
Pokorny L.
Monday J.[1]
7-636-4
R32
Purtseladze S.[4]
Hussey G.
2-67-627-5
Broom C.
Berankis R.[6]
4-66-47-65
Chidekh C.
Karlovskiy E.
6-16-3
Snitari I.
Imamura M.
6-46-1
Fomin S.
Bakshi A.
6-36-756-1
Monday J.[1]
Henning P.
6-43-67-5
Loffhagen G.
Tkemaladze Z.
6-26-1
Glinka D.
Sun F.[5]
6-36-4
Bax F.
Uchida K.
7-636-4
Cina F.[8]
Bar Biryukov P.
6-46-4
Coulibaly E.[3]
Jones M.
6-37-66
Damm M.
Samuel T.
6-747-636-3
Pokorny L.
Gray A.
6-26-3
Simakin I.[2]
Van Wyk K.
6-06-1
Searle H.
Andaloro F.
6-747-626-3
Strombachs R.[9]
Samrej K.
6-46-2