Martin Damm vs Toby Samuel — Tbilisi CH Round of 32

Tbilisi CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Martin Damm
USA
Martin Damm
#104ATP
1706ELO
1657Hard ELO
$338kYTD
$910kCAREER
22 yrs · 203 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 19 May 2025
hard
GBR
Toby Samuel
#129ATP
1745ELO
1729Hard ELO
$175kYTD
$290kCAREER
23 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLLWW
Damm M.
6-7 7-6 6-3
Samuel T.
Damm M.
647762
Samuel T.
776331

Martin Damm defeated Toby Samuel 6-7 7-6 6-3 in the Tbilisi CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Toby Samuel came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Martin Damm claimed a first win over Toby Samuel in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-05-18Roland GarrosQFclayToby Samuel6.11-7.13 2-6

Serve vs return

This season
Damm M.serving84% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Samuel T.

Samuel T.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Damm M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Damm M.Samuel T.
1st serve in·Even
62%
66%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
80%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
56%
Service points won·Slight edge
69%
64%
Return points won·Slight edge
33%
43%
Break points saved·Even
65%
66%
Aces / match·Dominant
12.7
3.8
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.0
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (73 vs 47). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Damm M.
3.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Samuel T.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Injury return: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
4.2Hard Elo 1657
Surface ELO
5.8+72 Hard Elo edge
4.6Overall Elo 1706
ELO gap
5.4Overall Elo 1745
5.0
H2H
5.0
2.9
Surface form
3.2
0.0Lost last 10
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
Prev. match
7.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Damm M.Samuel T.
Freshness·Even
92
94

Damm M.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Samuel T.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Purtseladze S.[4]
Cina F.[8]
7-656-4
Semi-finals
Purtseladze S.[4]
Damm M.
7-56-747-67
Cina F.[8]
Broom C.
6-26-757-65
Quarter-finals
Damm M.
Loffhagen G.
W/O
Cina F.[8]
Coulibaly E.[3]
6-47-64
Purtseladze S.[4]
Glinka D.
7-655-77-610
Broom C.
Pokorny L.
3-66-46-0
R16
Purtseladze S.[4]
Fomin S.
6-37-64
Glinka D.
Searle H.
7-646-3
Damm M.
Strombachs R.[9]
6-16-3
Coulibaly E.[3]
Bax F.
6-26-747-61
Cina F.[8]
Snitari I.
6-17-5
Loffhagen G.
Simakin I.[2]
6-47-5
Broom C.
Chidekh C.
6-33-66-4
Pokorny L.
Monday J.[1]
7-636-4
R32
Purtseladze S.[4]
Hussey G.
2-67-627-5
Broom C.
Berankis R.[6]
4-66-47-65
Chidekh C.
Karlovskiy E.
6-16-3
Snitari I.
Imamura M.
6-46-1
Fomin S.
Bakshi A.
6-36-756-1
Monday J.[1]
Henning P.
6-43-67-5
Loffhagen G.
Tkemaladze Z.
6-26-1
Glinka D.
Sun F.[5]
6-36-4
Bax F.
Uchida K.
7-636-4
Cina F.[8]
Bar Biryukov P.
6-46-4
Coulibaly E.[3]
Jones M.
6-37-66
Damm M.
Samuel T.
6-747-636-3
Pokorny L.
Gray A.
6-26-3
Simakin I.[2]
Van Wyk K.
6-06-1
Searle H.
Andaloro F.
6-747-626-3
Strombachs R.[9]
Samrej K.
6-46-2