Martin Damm vs George Loffhagen — Tbilisi CH Quarter-final

Tbilisi CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Martin Damm
USA
Martin Damm
#106ATP
1706ELO
1657Hard ELO
$338kYTD
$910kCAREER
22 yrs · 203 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
—
Sets
Walkover
Monday, 19 May 2025
hard
George Loffhagen
GBR
George Loffhagen
#301ATP
1452ELO
1440Hard ELO
25 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLLL
Damm M.
vs
Loffhagen G.

Martin Damm advanced past George Loffhagen via walkover in the Tbilisi CH quarter-final.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Damm M.serving92% hold

wins 72% of points on serve vs Loffhagen G.

Loffhagen G.serving91% hold

wins 71% of points on serve vs Damm M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Damm M.Loffhagen G.
1st serve in·Even
62%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
80%
75%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
70%
65%
Return points won·Even
33%
37%
Break points saved·Even
65%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
12.8
7.4
Double faults / match·Even
4.0
4.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (74 vs 46). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Damm M.
4.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Loffhagen G.
3.1
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 322 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
7.6+217 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.4Hard Elo 1440
7.9Overall Elo 1706
ELO gap
2.1Overall Elo 1452
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.9
Surface form
0.0Lost last 10
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.0
Surface transition
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Damm M.Loffhagen G.
Freshness·
89
—

Damm M.: 10 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Purtseladze S.[4]
Cina F.[8]
7-656-4
Semi-finals
Purtseladze S.[4]
Damm M.
7-56-747-67
Cina F.[8]
Broom C.
6-26-757-65
Quarter-finals
Damm M.
Loffhagen G.
W/O
Cina F.[8]
Coulibaly E.[3]
6-47-64
Purtseladze S.[4]
Glinka D.
7-655-77-610
Broom C.
Pokorny L.
3-66-46-0
R16
Purtseladze S.[4]
Fomin S.
6-37-64
Glinka D.
Searle H.
7-646-3
Damm M.
Strombachs R.[9]
6-16-3
Coulibaly E.[3]
Bax F.
6-26-747-61
Cina F.[8]
Snitari I.
6-17-5
Loffhagen G.
Simakin I.[2]
6-47-5
Broom C.
Chidekh C.
6-33-66-4
Pokorny L.
Monday J.[1]
7-636-4
R32
Purtseladze S.[4]
Hussey G.
2-67-627-5
Broom C.
Berankis R.[6]
4-66-47-65
Chidekh C.
Karlovskiy E.
6-16-3
Snitari I.
Imamura M.
6-46-1
Fomin S.
Bakshi A.
6-36-756-1
Monday J.[1]
Henning P.
6-43-67-5
Loffhagen G.
Tkemaladze Z.
6-26-1
Glinka D.
Sun F.[5]
6-36-4
Bax F.
Uchida K.
7-636-4
Cina F.[8]
Bar Biryukov P.
6-46-4
Coulibaly E.[3]
Jones M.
6-37-66
Damm M.
Samuel T.
6-747-636-3
Pokorny L.
Gray A.
6-26-3
Simakin I.[2]
Van Wyk K.
6-06-1
Searle H.
Andaloro F.
6-747-626-3
Strombachs R.[9]
Samrej K.
6-46-2