Jay Clarke vs Nerman Fatic — Skopje CH Final

Skopje CH · CHALLENGER · Final
GBR3
Jay Clarke
#239ATP
1458ELO
1414Clay ELO
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 19 May 2025
clay
BIH
Nerman Fatic
#396ATP
1496ELO
1478Clay ELO
31 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWLW
Clarke J.
6-2 6-3
Fatic N.
Clarke J.
662
Fatic N.
230

Jay Clarke defeated Nerman Fatic 6-2 6-3 in the Skopje CH final on clay. The result followed the form book — Jay Clarke came in ranked #239, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Clarke J.serving66% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Fatic N.

Fatic N.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Clarke J.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Clarke J.Fatic N.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
51%
Service points won·Even
60%
62%
Return points won·Even
41%
40%
Break points saved·Even
60%
58%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.4
4.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.9
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (79 vs 54). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clarke J.Fatic N.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
8
24
Break points saved·Even
63
63
Break points won·Clear edge
21
36
Deciding sets·Clear edge
10
24
Tiebreaks·Dominant
4
35

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Clarke J.
3.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 84 days (−1.2)
Fatic N.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.9Clay Elo 1414
Surface ELO
6.1+64 Clay Elo edge
4.2Overall Elo 1458
ELO gap
5.8Overall Elo 1496
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.1
Surface form
5.3
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
6.7
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Clarke J.[3]
Fatic N.
6-26-3
Semi-finals
Fatic N.
Poljicak M.[8]
6-45-76-4
Clarke J.[3]
Dellien H.[1]
7-646-3
Quarter-finals
Poljicak M.[8]
Geerts M.
7-636-1
Fatic N.
Negritu C.
3-67-666-2
Dellien H.[1]
Michalski D.
6-26-1
Clarke J.[3]
Schwaerzler J.
6-36-1
R16
Clarke J.[3]
Cachin P.
6-46-4
Schwaerzler J.
Sharipov M.[6]
6-26-4
Geerts M.
Roca Batalla O.[4]
0-66-47-65
Negritu C.
Agamenone F.
6-44-66-1
Dellien H.[1]
Brunold M.
6-14-66-4
Poljicak M.[8]
Olivieri G.
7-56-3
Michalski D.
Denolly C.
6-16-2
Fatic N.
Durasovic V.[5]
6-36-4
R32
Schwaerzler J.
Bueno G.
6-46-3
Sharipov M.[6]
Milev Y.
7-56-3
Clarke J.[3]
Sels J.
6-36-2
Roca Batalla O.[4]
Oberleitner N.
6-726-36-4
Agamenone F.
Shelbayh A.
6-47-5
Geerts M.
Mrva M.
6-26-1
Poljicak M.[8]
Ivanovski K.
6-46-756-4
Brunold M.
Mikrut L.
6-36-4
Negritu C.
Dodig M.
6-14-66-4
Cachin P.
Dhamne M.
6-26-1
Fatic N.
Alvarez Varona N.
6-32-66-4
Dellien H.[1]
Kodat T.
6-46-3
Olivieri G.
Marmousez L.
6-43-66-1
Denolly C.
Budkov Kjaer N.
7-626-1
Michalski D.
Houkes M.[7]
7-644-67-68
Durasovic V.[5]
Travaglia S.
4-66-47-65