Mika Brunold vs Luka Mikrut — Skopje CH Round of 32

Skopje CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
SUI
Mika Brunold
#414ATP
1466ELO
1407Clay ELO
21 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 19 May 2025
clay
CRO
Luka Mikrut
#172ATP
1597ELO
1619Clay ELO
$79kYTD
$252kCAREER
22 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWWWW
Brunold M.
6-3 6-4
Mikrut L.
Brunold M.
662
Mikrut L.
340

Mika Brunold defeated Luka Mikrut 6-3 6-4 in the Skopje CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Luka Mikrut came in ranked #172, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

  • Match story: Mika Brunold closed it out in two sets, 6–3 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Brunold M.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Mikrut L.

Mikrut L.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Brunold M.

Serve advantage — Mikrut L.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Brunold M.Mikrut L.
1st serve in·Even
63%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
67%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
51%
Service points won·Even
61%
64%
Return points won·Even
40%
40%
Break points saved·Even
59%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.6
5.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.1
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (71 vs 62). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Brunold M.Mikrut L.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
24
54
Break points saved·Slight edge
72
77
Break points won·Clear edge
15
29
Deciding sets·Dominant
3
81
Tiebreaks·Dominant
92
59

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Brunold M.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Mikrut L.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
2.7Clay Elo 1407
Surface ELO
7.3+212 Clay Elo edge
4.0Overall Elo 1466
ELO gap
6.0Overall Elo 1597
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.1
Surface form
5.5
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.2
Minutes 14d
8.8
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Brunold M.Mikrut L.
Freshness·
—
100

Mikrut L.: 21 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Clarke J.[3]
Fatic N.
6-26-3
Semi-finals
Fatic N.
Poljicak M.[8]
6-45-76-4
Clarke J.[3]
Dellien H.[1]
7-646-3
Quarter-finals
Poljicak M.[8]
Geerts M.
7-636-1
Fatic N.
Negritu C.
3-67-666-2
Dellien H.[1]
Michalski D.
6-26-1
Clarke J.[3]
Schwaerzler J.
6-36-1
R16
Clarke J.[3]
Cachin P.
6-46-4
Schwaerzler J.
Sharipov M.[6]
6-26-4
Geerts M.
Roca Batalla O.[4]
0-66-47-65
Negritu C.
Agamenone F.
6-44-66-1
Dellien H.[1]
Brunold M.
6-14-66-4
Poljicak M.[8]
Olivieri G.
7-56-3
Michalski D.
Denolly C.
6-16-2
Fatic N.
Durasovic V.[5]
6-36-4
R32
Schwaerzler J.
Bueno G.
6-46-3
Sharipov M.[6]
Milev Y.
7-56-3
Clarke J.[3]
Sels J.
6-36-2
Roca Batalla O.[4]
Oberleitner N.
6-726-36-4
Agamenone F.
Shelbayh A.
6-47-5
Geerts M.
Mrva M.
6-26-1
Poljicak M.[8]
Ivanovski K.
6-46-756-4
Brunold M.
Mikrut L.
6-36-4
Negritu C.
Dodig M.
6-14-66-4
Cachin P.
Dhamne M.
6-26-1
Fatic N.
Alvarez Varona N.
6-32-66-4
Dellien H.[1]
Kodat T.
6-46-3
Olivieri G.
Marmousez L.
6-43-66-1
Denolly C.
Budkov Kjaer N.
7-626-1
Michalski D.
Houkes M.[7]
7-644-67-68
Durasovic V.[5]
Travaglia S.
4-66-47-65