Jaqueline Cristian vs Aliona Bolsova — Rabat Round of 16

Rabat · WTA · Round of 16
Jaqueline Cristian
ROU
Jaqueline Cristian
#36WTA
1834ELO
1746Clay ELO
$742kYTD
$3.7MCAREER
28 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 19 May 2025
clay
Aliona Bolsova
ESP
Aliona Bolsova
#333WTA
1510ELO
1487Clay ELO
28 yrs · 172 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLWLWL
Cristian J.
7-6 7-6
Bolsova A.
Cristian J.
77772
Bolsova A.
61610

Jaqueline Cristian defeated Aliona Bolsova 7-6 7-6 in the Rabat round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Jaqueline Cristian came in ranked #36.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Cristian J.serving62% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Bolsova A.

Bolsova A.serving67% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Cristian J.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Cristian J.Bolsova A.
1st serve in·Clear edge
61%
75%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
64%
58%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
43%
Service points won·Even
57%
55%
Return points won·Even
42%
46%
Break points saved·Even
56%
53%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.7
1.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.3
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (77 vs 68). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cristian J.Bolsova A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
77
18
Break points saved·Dominant
84
30
Break points won·Slight edge
71
80
Deciding sets·Dominant
91
21
Tiebreaks·Dominant
88
55

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cristian J.
7.6
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Bolsova A.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
8.3+259 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.7Clay Elo 1487
9.0Overall Elo 1834
ELO gap
1.0Overall Elo 1510
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.2
Surface form
5.8
Fatigue & Travel
7.2
Minutes 14d
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
21°CMainly clear
Wind 18 km/hHumidity 57%

Draw

Final
Joint M.
Cristian J.
6-36-2
Semi-finals
Joint M.
Tomljanovic A.
6-40-0
Cristian J.
Osorio C.[2]
6-766-46-4
Quarter-finals
Cristian J.
Sevastova A.
6-36-4
Tomljanovic A.
Bouzas Maneiro J.[10]
6-16-3
Osorio C.[2]
Mateas M.
6-36-1
Joint M.
Li A.[4]
6-26-1
R16
Cristian J.
Bolsova A.
7-617-61
Bouzas Maneiro J.[10]
Nahimana S.
6-44-66-1
Tomljanovic A.
Pieri T.
4-66-26-4
Joint M.
Volynets K.[9]
6-06-3
Mateas M.
Rus A.
6-46-2
Li A.[4]
Baptiste H.
6-46-757-5
Osorio C.[2]
Rakhimova K.
4-66-26-3
Sevastova A.
Sonmez Z.
6-36-4
R32
Sevastova A.
Kabbaj Y.
5-76-47-5
Tomljanovic A.
Tomova V.[5]
7-54-66-3
Bolsova A.
Siniakova K.[6]
3-66-16-2
Bouzas Maneiro J.[10]
Grabher J.
6-31-66-4
Joint M.
Konjuh A.
7-56-2
Volynets K.[9]
Alves C.
6-36-0
Sonmez Z.
Bronzetti L.[3]
6-26-1
Li A.[4]
Timofeeva M.
7-666-2
Rus A.
Fossa Huergo N.
6-36-776-1
Cristian J.
Kotliar Y.
6-36-1
Nahimana S.
El Aouni A.
6-36-2
Baptiste H.
Rosatello C.
7-653-66-2
Osorio C.[2]
Cocciaretto E.
2-66-36-2
Pieri T.
Martinez Cirez C.
6-36-0
Mateas M.
Mandlik E.
6-36-4
Rakhimova K.
Teichmann J.
6-46-1