Charles Broom vs Ricardas Berankis — Tbilisi CH Round of 32

Tbilisi CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
GBR
Charles Broom
#285ATP
1409ELO
1396Hard ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 19 May 2025
hard
LTU6
Ricardas Berankis
36 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWWWL
Broom C.
4-6 6-4 7-6
Berankis R.
Broom C.
46772
Berankis R.
64651

Charles Broom defeated Ricardas Berankis 4-6 6-4 7-6 in the Tbilisi CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Broom C.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Berankis R.

Berankis R.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Broom C.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Broom C.Berankis R.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
54%
Service points won·Even
65%
65%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
68%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.5
3.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.3
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (42 vs 38). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Broom C.Berankis R.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
12
58
Break points saved·Dominant
56
91
Break points won·Clear edge
0
16
Deciding sets·Dominant
42
80
Tiebreaks·Dominant
10
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Broom C.
3.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 91 days (−1.5)
Berankis R.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Injury return: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
0.8
Surface form
7.4
0.0Lost last 7
Win streak
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Purtseladze S.[4]
Cina F.[8]
7-656-4
Semi-finals
Purtseladze S.[4]
Damm M.
7-56-747-67
Cina F.[8]
Broom C.
6-26-757-65
Quarter-finals
Damm M.
Loffhagen G.
W/O
Cina F.[8]
Coulibaly E.[3]
6-47-64
Purtseladze S.[4]
Glinka D.
7-655-77-610
Broom C.
Pokorny L.
3-66-46-0
R16
Purtseladze S.[4]
Fomin S.
6-37-64
Glinka D.
Searle H.
7-646-3
Damm M.
Strombachs R.[9]
6-16-3
Coulibaly E.[3]
Bax F.
6-26-747-61
Cina F.[8]
Snitari I.
6-17-5
Loffhagen G.
Simakin I.[2]
6-47-5
Broom C.
Chidekh C.
6-33-66-4
Pokorny L.
Monday J.[1]
7-636-4
R32
Purtseladze S.[4]
Hussey G.
2-67-627-5
Broom C.
Berankis R.[6]
4-66-47-65
Chidekh C.
Karlovskiy E.
6-16-3
Snitari I.
Imamura M.
6-46-1
Fomin S.
Bakshi A.
6-36-756-1
Monday J.[1]
Henning P.
6-43-67-5
Loffhagen G.
Tkemaladze Z.
6-26-1
Glinka D.
Sun F.[5]
6-36-4
Bax F.
Uchida K.
7-636-4
Cina F.[8]
Bar Biryukov P.
6-46-4
Coulibaly E.[3]
Jones M.
6-37-66
Damm M.
Samuel T.
6-747-636-3
Pokorny L.
Gray A.
6-26-3
Simakin I.[2]
Van Wyk K.
6-06-1
Searle H.
Andaloro F.
6-747-626-3
Strombachs R.[9]
Samrej K.
6-46-2