Emil Ruusuvuori vs Luka Mikrut — Zagreb CH Round of 32

Zagreb CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
FIN
Emil Ruusuvuori
#786ATP
1606ELO
1558Clay ELO
27 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 12 May 2025
clay
CRO
Luka Mikrut
#180ATP
1597ELO
1619Clay ELO
$79kYTD
$252kCAREER
22 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWWWW
Ruusuvuori E.
6-4 3-6 6-3
Mikrut L.
Ruusuvuori E.
6362
Mikrut L.
4631

Emil Ruusuvuori defeated Luka Mikrut 6-4 3-6 6-3 in the Zagreb CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Luka Mikrut came in ranked #180, defending last year's final.

Key context

  • Match story: Emil Ruusuvuori closed it out in three sets, 6–4 3–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ruusuvuori E.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Mikrut L.

Mikrut L.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Ruusuvuori E.

Serve advantage — Mikrut L.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ruusuvuori E.Mikrut L.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
51%
Service points won·Even
64%
64%
Return points won·Slight edge
35%
40%
Break points saved·Even
61%
63%
Aces / match·Clear edge
7.3
5.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.3
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (24 vs 62). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ruusuvuori E.Mikrut L.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
72
54
Break points saved·Clear edge
97
77
Break points won·Clear edge
48
29
Deciding sets·Even
80
81
Tiebreaks·Dominant
86
59

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ruusuvuori E.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Mikrut L.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 56 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
4.5Clay Elo 1558
Surface ELO
5.5+60 Clay Elo edge
5.6Overall Elo 1606
ELO gap
4.4Overall Elo 1597
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.5
Surface form
6.3
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Prev. match
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Ruusuvuori E.Mikrut L.
Freshness·
—
100

Mikrut L.: 17 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Prizmic D.
Van Assche L.
6-20-0
Semi-finals
Prizmic D.
Trungelliti M.
6-36-757-5
Van Assche L.
Pavlovic L.
6-36-2
Quarter-finals
Trungelliti M.
Mayot H.[4]
7-646-2
Pavlovic L.
Poljicak M.
6-17-5
Van Assche L.
Misolic F.[8]
6-46-4
Prizmic D.
Kym J.[2]
6-26-3
R16
Mayot H.[4]
Karol M.
6-26-4
Misolic F.[8]
Coppejans K.
7-652-67-65
Trungelliti M.
Mena F.
2-66-47-64
Van Assche L.
Kuzmanov D.
6-46-2
Kym J.[2]
Ruusuvuori E.
6-26-0
Poljicak M.
Popko D.[6]
6-36-2
Prizmic D.
Jacquet K.[5]
7-56-2
Pavlovic L.
Bueno G.
7-6146-4
R32
Prizmic D.
Basic M.
6-16-2
Bueno G.
Mannarino A.[1]
6-26-796-3
Pavlovic L.
Onclin G.
1-66-26-4
Poljicak M.
Fatic N.
4-66-37-62
Karol M.
Svajda Z.
6-26-3
Jacquet K.[5]
Blanchet U.
7-636-0
Ruusuvuori E.
Mikrut L.
6-43-66-3
Van Assche L.
Svrcina D.[3]
6-26-1
Kuzmanov D.
Durasovic V.
6-47-5
Coppejans K.
Gombos N.
6-36-3
Misolic F.[8]
Houkes M.
6-16-1
Mena F.
Ajdukovic D.[7]
6-27-62
Kym J.[2]
Zhukayev B.
6-24-0
Popko D.[6]
Dodig M.
6-46-4
Mayot H.[4]
Rodionov J.
7-56-736-2
Trungelliti M.
Oberleitner N.
6-22-66-4