Victoria Mboko vs Xin Yu Wang — Parma 125 Quarter-final

Parma 125 · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Victoria Mboko
CAN
Victoria Mboko
#12WTA
2006ELO
1856Clay ELO
$1.8MYTD
$3.3MCAREER
19 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWWLL
0 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 May 2025
clay
CHN
Xin Yu Wang
1760ELO
1634Clay ELO
24 yrs · 182 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWLLL
Mboko V.
6-4 6-0
Wang X.
Mboko V.
662
Wang X.
40–

Victoria Mboko defeated Xin Yu Wang 6-4 6-0 in the Parma 125 quarter-final on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mboko V.serving66% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Wang X.

Wang X.serving52% hold

wins 51% of points on serve vs Mboko V.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Mboko V.Wang X.
—
Serve
—
—
Return
0

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Mboko V.Wang X.
1st serve in·Even
66%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
46%
Service points won·Even
62%
59%
Return points won·Even
45%
42%
Break points saved·Even
60%
57%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.3
3.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
4.6
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (88 vs 69). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mboko V.Wang X.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
97
60
Break points saved·Slight edge
95
86
Break points won·Clear edge
100
78
Deciding sets·Clear edge
100
86
Tiebreaks·
—
4

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mboko V.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Wang X.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.3+223 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.7Clay Elo 1634
8.4Overall Elo 2006
ELO gap
1.6Overall Elo 1760
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.7
Surface form
4.4
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
8.1
Minutes 14d
9.1
0.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Sherif M.
Mboko V.
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Sherif M.
Waltert S.
6-46-4
Mboko V.
Begu I.
6-16-3
Quarter-finals
Waltert S.
Stakusic M.
3-66-27-5
Mboko V.
Wang X.
6-46-0
Sherif M.
Putintseva Y.
W/O
Begu I.
Bondar A.
3-66-37-65
R16
Putintseva Y.
Friedsam A.
6-46-4
Sherif M.
Hon P.
6-36-3
Stakusic M.
Ruzic A.
4-66-16-4
Waltert S.
Zarazua R.
6-46-3
Begu I.
Grabher J.
1-66-16-2
Bondar A.
Rosatello C.
6-16-3
Mboko V.
Teichmann J.
6-736-36-2
Wang X.
Lepchenko V.
3-66-36-4
R32
Putintseva Y.
Shibahara E.
6-36-4
Friedsam A.
Arango E.
6-34-66-4
Hon P.
Seidel E.
2-66-26-4
Sherif M.
Von Deichmann K.
7-56-2
Stakusic M.
Osorio C.
6-36-1
Ruzic A.
Zantedeschi A.
6-06-2
Waltert S.
Wang X.
6-36-3
Zarazua R.
Tig P.
7-56-0
Begu I.
Jimenez Kasintseva V.
6-766-17-63
Grabher J.
Semenistaja D.
6-43-66-1
Rosatello C.
Fossa Huergo N.
6-26-0
Teichmann J.
Sonmez Z.
7-656-3
Mboko V.
Parrizas Diaz N.
5-76-46-3
Lepchenko V.
Udvardy P.
6-43-66-3
Bondar A.
Parks A.
6-26-4
Wang X.
Zhang S.
6-46-3