Victoria Mboko vs Jil Teichmann — Parma 125 Round of 16

Parma 125 · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Victoria Mboko
CAN
Victoria Mboko
#12WTA
2006ELO
1856Clay ELO
$1.8MYTD
$3.3MCAREER
19 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 12 May 2025
clay
Jil Teichmann
SUI
Jil Teichmann
#119WTA
1687ELO
1653Clay ELO
28 yrs · 170 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
Mboko V.
6-7 6-3 6-2
Teichmann J.
Mboko V.
63662
Teichmann J.
77321

Victoria Mboko defeated Jil Teichmann 6-7 6-3 6-2 in the Parma 125 round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Victoria Mboko came in ranked #12.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mboko V.serving62% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Teichmann J.

Teichmann J.serving45% hold

wins 48% of points on serve vs Mboko V.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mboko V.Teichmann J.
1st serve in·Even
66%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
70%
62%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
48%
Service points won·Slight edge
62%
57%
Return points won·Even
46%
44%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
52%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.3
2.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.6
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (88 vs 47). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mboko V.Teichmann J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
97
50
Break points saved·Clear edge
95
71
Break points won·Clear edge
100
84
Deciding sets·Dominant
100
32
Tiebreaks·
—
90

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mboko V.
7.4
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Teichmann J.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
8.2+204 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.8Clay Elo 1653
10.0Overall Elo 2006
ELO gap
0.0Overall Elo 1687
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.7
Surface form
3.6
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.1
Minutes 14d
9.2
0.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Mboko V.Teichmann J.
Freshness·
—
100

Teichmann J.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Sherif M.
Mboko V.
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Sherif M.
Waltert S.
6-46-4
Mboko V.
Begu I.
6-16-3
Quarter-finals
Waltert S.
Stakusic M.
3-66-27-5
Mboko V.
Wang X.
6-46-0
Sherif M.
Putintseva Y.
W/O
Begu I.
Bondar A.
3-66-37-65
R16
Putintseva Y.
Friedsam A.
6-46-4
Sherif M.
Hon P.
6-36-3
Stakusic M.
Ruzic A.
4-66-16-4
Waltert S.
Zarazua R.
6-46-3
Begu I.
Grabher J.
1-66-16-2
Bondar A.
Rosatello C.
6-16-3
Mboko V.
Teichmann J.
6-736-36-2
Wang X.
Lepchenko V.
3-66-36-4
R32
Putintseva Y.
Shibahara E.
6-36-4
Friedsam A.
Arango E.
6-34-66-4
Hon P.
Seidel E.
2-66-26-4
Sherif M.
Von Deichmann K.
7-56-2
Stakusic M.
Osorio C.
6-36-1
Ruzic A.
Zantedeschi A.
6-06-2
Waltert S.
Wang X.
6-36-3
Zarazua R.
Tig P.
7-56-0
Begu I.
Jimenez Kasintseva V.
6-766-17-63
Grabher J.
Semenistaja D.
6-43-66-1
Rosatello C.
Fossa Huergo N.
6-26-0
Teichmann J.
Sonmez Z.
7-656-3
Mboko V.
Parrizas Diaz N.
5-76-46-3
Lepchenko V.
Udvardy P.
6-43-66-3
Bondar A.
Parks A.
6-26-4
Wang X.
Zhang S.
6-46-3