Marco Trungelliti vs Harold Mayot — Zagreb CH Quarter-final

Zagreb CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Marco Trungelliti
ARG
Marco Trungelliti
#94ATP
1627ELO
1621Clay ELO
$395kYTD
$2.6MCAREER
36 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 May 2025
clay
Harold Mayot
FRA4
Harold Mayot
#199ATP
1571ELO
1546Clay ELO
$72kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
24 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWWLWW
Trungelliti M.
7-6 6-2
Mayot H.
Trungelliti M.
7762
Mayot H.
6420

Marco Trungelliti defeated Harold Mayot 7-6 6-2 in the Zagreb CH quarter-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Marco Trungelliti came in ranked #94.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Trungelliti M.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Mayot H.

Mayot H.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Trungelliti M.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Trungelliti M.Mayot H.
1st serve in·Even
60%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
61%
63%
Return points won·Even
41%
39%
Break points saved·Even
62%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.7
4.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.7
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (103 vs 81). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Trungelliti M.Mayot H.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
51
29
Break points saved·Slight edge
87
92
Break points won·Even
24
22
Deciding sets·Dominant
87
32
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
19
8

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Trungelliti M.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Mayot H.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.9+75 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.1Clay Elo 1546
5.6Overall Elo 1627
ELO gap
4.4Overall Elo 1571
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.6
Surface form
4.1
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
6.3
Minutes 14d
7.9
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Trungelliti M.Mayot H.
Freshness·Slight edge
93
99

Trungelliti M.: 12 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Mayot H.: 12 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Prizmic D.
Van Assche L.
6-20-0
Semi-finals
Prizmic D.
Trungelliti M.
6-36-757-5
Van Assche L.
Pavlovic L.
6-36-2
Quarter-finals
Trungelliti M.
Mayot H.[4]
7-646-2
Pavlovic L.
Poljicak M.
6-17-5
Van Assche L.
Misolic F.[8]
6-46-4
Prizmic D.
Kym J.[2]
6-26-3
R16
Mayot H.[4]
Karol M.
6-26-4
Misolic F.[8]
Coppejans K.
7-652-67-65
Trungelliti M.
Mena F.
2-66-47-64
Van Assche L.
Kuzmanov D.
6-46-2
Kym J.[2]
Ruusuvuori E.
6-26-0
Poljicak M.
Popko D.[6]
6-36-2
Prizmic D.
Jacquet K.[5]
7-56-2
Pavlovic L.
Bueno G.
7-6146-4
R32
Prizmic D.
Basic M.
6-16-2
Bueno G.
Mannarino A.[1]
6-26-796-3
Pavlovic L.
Onclin G.
1-66-26-4
Poljicak M.
Fatic N.
4-66-37-62
Karol M.
Svajda Z.
6-26-3
Jacquet K.[5]
Blanchet U.
7-636-0
Ruusuvuori E.
Mikrut L.
6-43-66-3
Van Assche L.
Svrcina D.[3]
6-26-1
Kuzmanov D.
Durasovic V.
6-47-5
Coppejans K.
Gombos N.
6-36-3
Misolic F.[8]
Houkes M.
6-16-1
Mena F.
Ajdukovic D.[7]
6-27-62
Kym J.[2]
Zhukayev B.
6-24-0
Popko D.[6]
Dodig M.
6-46-4
Mayot H.[4]
Rodionov J.
7-56-736-2
Trungelliti M.
Oberleitner N.
6-22-66-4