Filip Misolic vs Max Houkes — Zagreb CH Round of 32

Zagreb CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Filip Misolic
AUT8
Filip Misolic
#221ATP
1587ELO
1664Clay ELO
$111kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
24 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 May 2025
clay
NED
Max Houkes
#239ATP
1460ELO
1444Clay ELO
26 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWL
Misolic F.
6-1 6-1
Houkes M.
Misolic F.
662
Houkes M.
110

Filip Misolic defeated Max Houkes 6-1 6-1 in the Zagreb CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Filip Misolic came in ranked #221, defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Misolic F.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Houkes M.

Houkes M.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Misolic F.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Misolic F.Houkes M.
1st serve in·Even
62%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
62%
59%
Return points won·Even
40%
41%
Break points saved·Even
62%
59%
Aces / match·Even
3.5
3.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.4
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (84 vs 67). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Misolic F.Houkes M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
79
23
Break points saved·Dominant
91
66
Break points won·Clear edge
53
29
Deciding sets·Dominant
94
34
Tiebreaks·Dominant
97
16

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Misolic F.
7.6
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Houkes M.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.1+220 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.9Clay Elo 1444
6.0Overall Elo 1587
ELO gap
4.0Overall Elo 1460
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
8.4
Surface form
4.7
9.05-match win streak
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
3.1
Minutes 14d
6.0
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Misolic F.Houkes M.
Freshness·
—
100

Houkes M.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Prizmic D.
Van Assche L.
6-20-0
Semi-finals
Prizmic D.
Trungelliti M.
6-36-757-5
Van Assche L.
Pavlovic L.
6-36-2
Quarter-finals
Trungelliti M.
Mayot H.[4]
7-646-2
Pavlovic L.
Poljicak M.
6-17-5
Van Assche L.
Misolic F.[8]
6-46-4
Prizmic D.
Kym J.[2]
6-26-3
R16
Mayot H.[4]
Karol M.
6-26-4
Misolic F.[8]
Coppejans K.
7-652-67-65
Trungelliti M.
Mena F.
2-66-47-64
Van Assche L.
Kuzmanov D.
6-46-2
Kym J.[2]
Ruusuvuori E.
6-26-0
Poljicak M.
Popko D.[6]
6-36-2
Prizmic D.
Jacquet K.[5]
7-56-2
Pavlovic L.
Bueno G.
7-6146-4
R32
Prizmic D.
Basic M.
6-16-2
Bueno G.
Mannarino A.[1]
6-26-796-3
Pavlovic L.
Onclin G.
1-66-26-4
Poljicak M.
Fatic N.
4-66-37-62
Karol M.
Svajda Z.
6-26-3
Jacquet K.[5]
Blanchet U.
7-636-0
Ruusuvuori E.
Mikrut L.
6-43-66-3
Van Assche L.
Svrcina D.[3]
6-26-1
Kuzmanov D.
Durasovic V.
6-47-5
Coppejans K.
Gombos N.
6-36-3
Misolic F.[8]
Houkes M.
6-16-1
Mena F.
Ajdukovic D.[7]
6-27-62
Kym J.[2]
Zhukayev B.
6-24-0
Popko D.[6]
Dodig M.
6-46-4
Mayot H.[4]
Rodionov J.
7-56-736-2
Trungelliti M.
Oberleitner N.
6-22-66-4