Ivan Gakhov vs Coleman Wong — Tunis CH Quarter-final

Tunis CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Ivan Gakhov
RUS
Ivan Gakhov
#387ATP
1430ELO
1384Clay ELO
29 yrs · 191 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 12 May 2025
clay
HKG4
Coleman Wong
#108ATP
1602ELO
1467Clay ELO
$287kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
22 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLWLLW
Gakhov I.
6-7 6-2 6-4
Wong C.
Gakhov I.
63662
Wong C.
77241

Ivan Gakhov defeated Coleman Wong 6-7 6-2 6-4 in the Tunis CH quarter-final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Coleman Wong came in ranked #108.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gakhov I.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Wong C.

Wong C.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Gakhov I.

Serve advantage — Wong C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gakhov I.Wong C.
1st serve in·Even
61%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
60%
65%
Return points won·Even
38%
36%
Break points saved·Even
60%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.5
8.8
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.6
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (71 vs 99). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gakhov I.Wong C.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
34
42
Break points saved·Slight edge
82
91
Break points won·Even
9
5
Deciding sets·Clear edge
59
43
Tiebreaks·Dominant
22
88

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gakhov I.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Wong C.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.9Clay Elo 1384
Surface ELO
6.1+82 Clay Elo edge
1.7Overall Elo 1430
ELO gap
8.3Overall Elo 1602
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.7
Surface form
0.0
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.6
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Gakhov I.Wong C.
Freshness·
—
100

Wong C.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Piros Z.[8]
Droguet T.
7-57-63
Semi-finals
Droguet T.
Rodesch C.[5]
6-21-66-2
Piros Z.[8]
Gakhov I.
6-26-1
Quarter-finals
Droguet T.
Coria F.[3]
6-11-1
Piros Z.[8]
Maestrelli F.
6-36-2
Rodesch C.[5]
Royer V.[1]
6-36-4
Gakhov I.
Wong C.[4]
6-736-26-4
R16
Rodesch C.[5]
Mrva M.
6-16-4
Royer V.[1]
Echargui M.
6-44-66-0
Gakhov I.
Tomic B.
6-16-4
Piros Z.[8]
Roca Batalla O.
6-46-2
Coria F.[3]
Dalla Valle E.
6-47-5
Droguet T.
Shimizu Y.[6]
6-46-3
Maestrelli F.
Nava E.[2]
7-616-3
Wong C.[4]
Dellien Velasco M.
7-57-5
R32
Shimizu Y.[6]
Paire B.
4-1
Droguet T.
Erhard M.
2-66-46-3
Royer V.[1]
Bertrand R.
6-36-2
Coria F.[3]
Ouakaa A.
6-37-5
Dalla Valle E.
Denolly C.
6-46-2
Piros Z.[8]
Barton H.
7-56-2
Roca Batalla O.
Butvilas E.
6-36-3
Maestrelli F.
Bertola R.
7-676-4
Dellien Velasco M.
Negritu C.
6-45-76-4
Nava E.[2]
Added D.
6-27-5
Mrva M.
Jianu F.
6-36-2
Rodesch C.[5]
Squire H.
6-37-66
Echargui M.
Watt J.
7-656-3
Tomic B.
Dougaz A.[7]
1-67-647-5
Wong C.[4]
Pacheco Mendez R.
6-26-2
Gakhov I.
Marti Pujolras A.
6-757-636-1