Moez Echargui vs James Watt — Tunis CH Round of 32

Tunis CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Moez Echargui
TUN
Moez Echargui
#157ATP
1416ELO
1342Clay ELO
$171kYTD
$469kCAREER
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 May 2025
clay
NZL
James Watt
#678ATP
1328ELO
1239Clay ELO
26 yrs · 206 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWWLWL
Echargui M.
7-6 6-3
Watt J.
Echargui M.
7762
Watt J.
6530

Moez Echargui defeated James Watt 7-6 6-3 in the Tunis CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Moez Echargui closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Echargui M.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Watt J.

Watt J.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Echargui M.

Serve advantage — Watt J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Echargui M.Watt J.
1st serve in·Clear edge
56%
68%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
69%
75%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
62%
68%
Return points won·Even
37%
34%
Break points saved·Even
59%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.4
9.3
Double faults / match·Even
2.7
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (61 vs 39). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Echargui M.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Watt J.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
7.1+103 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.9Clay Elo 1239
6.8Overall Elo 1416
ELO gap
3.2Overall Elo 1328
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.8
Surface form
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.8
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Echargui M.Watt J.
Freshness·
100
—

Echargui M.: 16 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Piros Z.[8]
Droguet T.
7-57-63
Semi-finals
Droguet T.
Rodesch C.[5]
6-21-66-2
Piros Z.[8]
Gakhov I.
6-26-1
Quarter-finals
Droguet T.
Coria F.[3]
6-11-1
Piros Z.[8]
Maestrelli F.
6-36-2
Rodesch C.[5]
Royer V.[1]
6-36-4
Gakhov I.
Wong C.[4]
6-736-26-4
R16
Rodesch C.[5]
Mrva M.
6-16-4
Royer V.[1]
Echargui M.
6-44-66-0
Gakhov I.
Tomic B.
6-16-4
Piros Z.[8]
Roca Batalla O.
6-46-2
Coria F.[3]
Dalla Valle E.
6-47-5
Droguet T.
Shimizu Y.[6]
6-46-3
Maestrelli F.
Nava E.[2]
7-616-3
Wong C.[4]
Dellien Velasco M.
7-57-5
R32
Shimizu Y.[6]
Paire B.
4-1
Droguet T.
Erhard M.
2-66-46-3
Royer V.[1]
Bertrand R.
6-36-2
Coria F.[3]
Ouakaa A.
6-37-5
Dalla Valle E.
Denolly C.
6-46-2
Piros Z.[8]
Barton H.
7-56-2
Roca Batalla O.
Butvilas E.
6-36-3
Maestrelli F.
Bertola R.
7-676-4
Dellien Velasco M.
Negritu C.
6-45-76-4
Nava E.[2]
Added D.
6-27-5
Mrva M.
Jianu F.
6-36-2
Rodesch C.[5]
Squire H.
6-37-66
Echargui M.
Watt J.
7-656-3
Tomic B.
Dougaz A.[7]
1-67-647-5
Wong C.[4]
Pacheco Mendez R.
6-26-2
Gakhov I.
Marti Pujolras A.
6-757-636-1