Kimmer Coppejans vs Norbert Gombos — Zagreb CH Round of 32

Zagreb CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Kimmer Coppejans
BEL
Kimmer Coppejans
#222ATP
1544ELO
1513Clay ELO
32 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWLWLLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 May 2025
clay
Norbert Gombos
SVK
Norbert Gombos
#364ATP
1472ELO
1455Clay ELO
35 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWLWLW
Coppejans K.
6-3 6-3
Gombos N.
Coppejans K.
662
Gombos N.
330

Kimmer Coppejans defeated Norbert Gombos 6-3 6-3 in the Zagreb CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Coppejans K.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Gombos N.

Gombos N.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Coppejans K.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Coppejans K.Gombos N.
1st serve in·Even
60%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Even
60%
63%
Return points won·Even
43%
39%
Break points saved·Even
58%
57%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.9
4.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.2
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (90 vs 82). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Coppejans K.Gombos N.
Clutch Rating·Even
44
41
Break points saved·Clear edge
67
83
Break points won·Clear edge
29
8
Deciding sets·Even
74
70
Tiebreaks·Even
43
39

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Coppejans K.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Gombos N.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.4+58 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.6Clay Elo 1455
5.6Overall Elo 1544
ELO gap
4.4Overall Elo 1472
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
5.7
Surface form
5.8
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
1.7
3-set count
0.0
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Coppejans K.Gombos N.
Freshness·Even
72
76

Coppejans K.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 56 games (7d) · Gombos N.: 4 days rest · 3 matches, 55 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Prizmic D.
Van Assche L.
6-20-0
Semi-finals
Prizmic D.
Trungelliti M.
6-36-757-5
Van Assche L.
Pavlovic L.
6-36-2
Quarter-finals
Trungelliti M.
Mayot H.[4]
7-646-2
Pavlovic L.
Poljicak M.
6-17-5
Van Assche L.
Misolic F.[8]
6-46-4
Prizmic D.
Kym J.[2]
6-26-3
R16
Mayot H.[4]
Karol M.
6-26-4
Misolic F.[8]
Coppejans K.
7-652-67-65
Trungelliti M.
Mena F.
2-66-47-64
Van Assche L.
Kuzmanov D.
6-46-2
Kym J.[2]
Ruusuvuori E.
6-26-0
Poljicak M.
Popko D.[6]
6-36-2
Prizmic D.
Jacquet K.[5]
7-56-2
Pavlovic L.
Bueno G.
7-6146-4
R32
Prizmic D.
Basic M.
6-16-2
Bueno G.
Mannarino A.[1]
6-26-796-3
Pavlovic L.
Onclin G.
1-66-26-4
Poljicak M.
Fatic N.
4-66-37-62
Karol M.
Svajda Z.
6-26-3
Jacquet K.[5]
Blanchet U.
7-636-0
Ruusuvuori E.
Mikrut L.
6-43-66-3
Van Assche L.
Svrcina D.[3]
6-26-1
Kuzmanov D.
Durasovic V.
6-47-5
Coppejans K.
Gombos N.
6-36-3
Misolic F.[8]
Houkes M.
6-16-1
Mena F.
Ajdukovic D.[7]
6-27-62
Kym J.[2]
Zhukayev B.
6-24-0
Popko D.[6]
Dodig M.
6-46-4
Mayot H.[4]
Rodionov J.
7-56-736-2
Trungelliti M.
Oberleitner N.
6-22-66-4