Irina Camelia Begu vs Anna Bondar — Parma 125 Quarter-final

Parma 125 · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Irina Camelia Begu
ROU
Irina Camelia Begu
#204WTA
1769ELO
1733Clay ELO
35 yrs · 181 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLWLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 12 May 2025
clay
Anna Bondar
HUN
Anna Bondar
#73WTA
1735ELO
1734Clay ELO
29 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLLWLLWW
Begu I.
3-6 6-3 7-6
Bondar A.
Begu I.
36772
Bondar A.
63651

Irina Camelia Begu defeated Anna Bondar 3-6 6-3 7-6 in the Parma 125 quarter-final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Anna Bondar came in ranked #73. Irina Camelia Begu extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-05-29Roland GarrosR128clayIrina Camelia Begu6-4 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Begu I.serving48% hold

wins 49% of points on serve vs Bondar A.

Bondar A.serving57% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Begu I.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Begu I.Bondar A.
—
Serve
54
—
Return
22

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Begu I.Bondar A.
1st serve in·Even
64%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
60%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
45%
48%
Service points won·Even
55%
59%
Return points won·Even
43%
43%
Break points saved·Slight edge
48%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.8
4.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.3
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (26 vs 85). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Begu I.Bondar A.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
68
51
Break points saved·Dominant
58
88
Break points won·Slight edge
88
77
Deciding sets·Dominant
81
27
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
88
78

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Begu I.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Bondar A.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.8Clay Elo 1733
Surface ELO
5.2+1 Clay Elo edge
4.9Overall Elo 1769
ELO gap
5.1Overall Elo 1735
10.0
H2H
0.0
5.2
Surface form
7.2
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Minutes 14d
8.9
3-set count
4.0
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Begu I.Bondar A.
Freshness·Clear edge
99
86

Begu I.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Bondar A.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 22 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Sherif M.
Mboko V.
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Sherif M.
Waltert S.
6-46-4
Mboko V.
Begu I.
6-16-3
Quarter-finals
Waltert S.
Stakusic M.
3-66-27-5
Mboko V.
Wang X.
6-46-0
Sherif M.
Putintseva Y.
W/O
Begu I.
Bondar A.
3-66-37-65
R16
Putintseva Y.
Friedsam A.
6-46-4
Sherif M.
Hon P.
6-36-3
Stakusic M.
Ruzic A.
4-66-16-4
Waltert S.
Zarazua R.
6-46-3
Begu I.
Grabher J.
1-66-16-2
Bondar A.
Rosatello C.
6-16-3
Mboko V.
Teichmann J.
6-736-36-2
Wang X.
Lepchenko V.
3-66-36-4
R32
Putintseva Y.
Shibahara E.
6-36-4
Friedsam A.
Arango E.
6-34-66-4
Hon P.
Seidel E.
2-66-26-4
Sherif M.
Von Deichmann K.
7-56-2
Stakusic M.
Osorio C.
6-36-1
Ruzic A.
Zantedeschi A.
6-06-2
Waltert S.
Wang X.
6-36-3
Zarazua R.
Tig P.
7-56-0
Begu I.
Jimenez Kasintseva V.
6-766-17-63
Grabher J.
Semenistaja D.
6-43-66-1
Rosatello C.
Fossa Huergo N.
6-26-0
Teichmann J.
Sonmez Z.
7-656-3
Mboko V.
Parrizas Diaz N.
5-76-46-3
Lepchenko V.
Udvardy P.
6-43-66-3
Bondar A.
Parks A.
6-26-4
Wang X.
Zhang S.
6-46-3