Zsombor Piros vs Hynek Barton — Tunis CH Round of 32

Tunis CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Zsombor Piros
HUN8
Zsombor Piros
#169ATP
1661ELO
1621Clay ELO
$145kYTD
$975kCAREER
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 May 2025
clay
CZE
Hynek Barton
#256ATP
1570ELO
1535Clay ELO
22 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWWLWW
Piros Z.
7-5 6-2
Barton H.
Piros Z.
762
Barton H.
520

Zsombor Piros defeated Hynek Barton 7-5 6-2 in the Tunis CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Zsombor Piros closed it out in two sets, 7–5 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Piros Z.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Barton H.

Barton H.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Piros Z.

Serve advantage — Piros Z.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Piros Z.Barton H.
1st serve in·Even
59%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
51%
Service points won·Even
63%
63%
Return points won·Even
42%
40%
Break points saved·Even
63%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.3
5.9
Double faults / match·Even
2.6
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (81 vs 102). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Piros Z.Barton H.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
56
38
Break points saved·Slight edge
84
79
Break points won·Dominant
32
6
Deciding sets·Clear edge
85
71
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
42
28

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Piros Z.
8.1
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Barton H.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
8.2+86 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.8Clay Elo 1535
8.1Overall Elo 1661
ELO gap
1.9Overall Elo 1570
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
8.6
Surface form
6.2
9.06-match win streak
Win streak
7.03-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
6.3
Minutes 14d
4.1
3-set count
4.0
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Piros Z.Barton H.
Freshness·Dominant
50
94

Piros Z.: 1 day rest · 5 matches, 107 games (7d) · Barton H.: 5 days rest · 1 match, 18 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Piros Z.[8]
Droguet T.
7-57-63
Semi-finals
Droguet T.
Rodesch C.[5]
6-21-66-2
Piros Z.[8]
Gakhov I.
6-26-1
Quarter-finals
Droguet T.
Coria F.[3]
6-11-1
Piros Z.[8]
Maestrelli F.
6-36-2
Rodesch C.[5]
Royer V.[1]
6-36-4
Gakhov I.
Wong C.[4]
6-736-26-4
R16
Rodesch C.[5]
Mrva M.
6-16-4
Royer V.[1]
Echargui M.
6-44-66-0
Gakhov I.
Tomic B.
6-16-4
Piros Z.[8]
Roca Batalla O.
6-46-2
Coria F.[3]
Dalla Valle E.
6-47-5
Droguet T.
Shimizu Y.[6]
6-46-3
Maestrelli F.
Nava E.[2]
7-616-3
Wong C.[4]
Dellien Velasco M.
7-57-5
R32
Shimizu Y.[6]
Paire B.
4-1
Droguet T.
Erhard M.
2-66-46-3
Royer V.[1]
Bertrand R.
6-36-2
Coria F.[3]
Ouakaa A.
6-37-5
Dalla Valle E.
Denolly C.
6-46-2
Piros Z.[8]
Barton H.
7-56-2
Roca Batalla O.
Butvilas E.
6-36-3
Maestrelli F.
Bertola R.
7-676-4
Dellien Velasco M.
Negritu C.
6-45-76-4
Nava E.[2]
Added D.
6-27-5
Mrva M.
Jianu F.
6-36-2
Rodesch C.[5]
Squire H.
6-37-66
Echargui M.
Watt J.
7-656-3
Tomic B.
Dougaz A.[7]
1-67-647-5
Wong C.[4]
Pacheco Mendez R.
6-26-2
Gakhov I.
Marti Pujolras A.
6-757-636-1