Luca Van Assche vs Filip Misolic — Zagreb CH Quarter-final

Zagreb CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Luca Van Assche
FRA
Luca Van Assche
#80ATP
1701ELO
1639Clay ELO
$411kYTD
$2.6MCAREER
22 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 May 2025
clay
Filip Misolic
AUT8
Filip Misolic
#221ATP
1587ELO
1664Clay ELO
$111kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
24 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLLL
Van Assche L.
6-4 6-4
Misolic F.
Van Assche L.
662
Misolic F.
440

Luca Van Assche defeated Filip Misolic 6-4 6-4 in the Zagreb CH quarter-final on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Luca Van Assche edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Van Assche L.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Misolic F.

Misolic F.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Van Assche L.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Van Assche L.Misolic F.
1st serve in·Even
64%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
51%
Service points won·Even
61%
62%
Return points won·Even
42%
40%
Break points saved·Even
60%
62%
Aces / match·Even
3.2
3.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.1
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (94 vs 84). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Van Assche L.Misolic F.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
67
79
Break points saved·Even
91
91
Break points won·Slight edge
61
53
Deciding sets·Clear edge
79
94
Tiebreaks·Dominant
51
97

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Van Assche L.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Misolic F.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.5Clay Elo 1639
Surface ELO
5.5+25 Clay Elo edge
6.5Overall Elo 1701
ELO gap
3.5Overall Elo 1587
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
3.4
Surface form
8.4
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
9.05-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.9
Minutes 14d
3.1
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Van Assche L.Misolic F.
Freshness·
99
—

Van Assche L.: 12 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Prizmic D.
Van Assche L.
6-20-0
Semi-finals
Prizmic D.
Trungelliti M.
6-36-757-5
Van Assche L.
Pavlovic L.
6-36-2
Quarter-finals
Trungelliti M.
Mayot H.[4]
7-646-2
Pavlovic L.
Poljicak M.
6-17-5
Van Assche L.
Misolic F.[8]
6-46-4
Prizmic D.
Kym J.[2]
6-26-3
R16
Mayot H.[4]
Karol M.
6-26-4
Misolic F.[8]
Coppejans K.
7-652-67-65
Trungelliti M.
Mena F.
2-66-47-64
Van Assche L.
Kuzmanov D.
6-46-2
Kym J.[2]
Ruusuvuori E.
6-26-0
Poljicak M.
Popko D.[6]
6-36-2
Prizmic D.
Jacquet K.[5]
7-56-2
Pavlovic L.
Bueno G.
7-6146-4
R32
Prizmic D.
Basic M.
6-16-2
Bueno G.
Mannarino A.[1]
6-26-796-3
Pavlovic L.
Onclin G.
1-66-26-4
Poljicak M.
Fatic N.
4-66-37-62
Karol M.
Svajda Z.
6-26-3
Jacquet K.[5]
Blanchet U.
7-636-0
Ruusuvuori E.
Mikrut L.
6-43-66-3
Van Assche L.
Svrcina D.[3]
6-26-1
Kuzmanov D.
Durasovic V.
6-47-5
Coppejans K.
Gombos N.
6-36-3
Misolic F.[8]
Houkes M.
6-16-1
Mena F.
Ajdukovic D.[7]
6-27-62
Kym J.[2]
Zhukayev B.
6-24-0
Popko D.[6]
Dodig M.
6-46-4
Mayot H.[4]
Rodionov J.
7-56-736-2
Trungelliti M.
Oberleitner N.
6-22-66-4