Filip Misolic vs Mees Rottgering — Prague CH Quarter-final

Prague CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Filip Misolic
AUT
Filip Misolic
#293ATP
1587ELO
1664Clay ELO
$111kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
24 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 5 May 2025
clay
NED
Mees Rottgering
#473ATP
1468ELO
1439Clay ELO
19 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWWLLW
Misolic F.
6-2 6-2
Rottgering M.
Misolic F.
662
Rottgering M.
220

Filip Misolic defeated Mees Rottgering 6-2 6-2 in the Prague CH quarter-final on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Misolic F.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Rottgering M.

Rottgering M.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Misolic F.

Serve advantage — Misolic F.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Misolic F.Rottgering M.
1st serve in·Even
63%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
62%
59%
Return points won·Even
40%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
61%
55%
Aces / match·Even
3.5
3.2
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.3
3.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (84 vs 18). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Misolic F.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Rottgering M.
4.1
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
7.7+225 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.3Clay Elo 1439
6.4Overall Elo 1587
ELO gap
3.6Overall Elo 1468
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.8
Surface form
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.4
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Misolic F.
Den Ouden G.
6-46-0
Semi-finals
Misolic F.
Klein L.
7-646-2
Den Ouden G.
Landaluce M.[2]
6-07-65
Quarter-finals
Misolic F.
Rottgering M.
6-26-2
Den Ouden G.
Blockx A.[3]
3-66-46-1
Klein L.
Chazal M.
7-646-3
Landaluce M.[2]
Budkov Kjaer N.
6-46-3
R16
Klein L.
Kukushkin M.[7]
W/O
Blockx A.[3]
Choinski J.
4-66-27-61
Landaluce M.[2]
Evans D.
6-36-3
Chazal M.
Brunclik P.
6-46-3
Rottgering M.
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
6-26-2
Misolic F.
Basilashvili N.[5]
6-07-5
Den Ouden G.
Barton H.
6-36-2
Budkov Kjaer N.
Hemery C.
6-26-3
R32
Brunclik P.
Mochizuki S.[1]
6-34-66-2
Klein L.
Holmgren A.
6-37-5
Kukushkin M.[7]
Mrva M.
6-05-76-4
Rottgering M.
Rincon D.
6-47-65
Misolic F.
Kumstat J.
6-47-5
Barton H.
Neumayer L.
4-66-16-2
Choinski J.
Rocha H.
6-37-5
Blockx A.[3]
Habib H.
6-46-2
Budkov Kjaer N.
Moro Canas A.[6]
7-56-1
Landaluce M.[2]
Rodionov J.
5-76-27-5
Chazal M.
Zhukayev B.
4-67-57-5
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
Popko D.[4]
7-634-66-2
Evans D.
Harris L.
6-17-5
Basilashvili N.[5]
Cornut Chauvinc A.
6-21-66-4
Hemery C.
Sachko V.
6-47-5
Den Ouden G.
Nagal S.[8]
6-16-1