Filip Misolic vs Lukas Klein — Prague CH Semi-final

Prague CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Filip Misolic
AUT
Filip Misolic
#293ATP
1587ELO
1664Clay ELO
$111kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
24 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 5 May 2025
clay
Lukas Klein
SVK
Lukas Klein
#185ATP
1601ELO
1624Clay ELO
$64kYTD
$1.3MCAREER
28 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWWWLW
Misolic F.
7-6 6-2
Klein L.
Misolic F.
7762
Klein L.
6420

Filip Misolic defeated Lukas Klein 7-6 6-2 in the Prague CH semi-final on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Filip Misolic closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Misolic F.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Klein L.

Klein L.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Misolic F.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Misolic F.Klein L.
1st serve in·Even
62%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
64%
Return points won·Even
40%
37%
Break points saved·Even
61%
64%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.5
4.9
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.3
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (84 vs 61). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Misolic F.Klein L.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
79
39
Break points saved·Even
91
92
Break points won·Dominant
53
1
Deciding sets·Dominant
94
63
Tiebreaks·Dominant
97
31

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Misolic F.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Klein L.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.5+40 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.5Clay Elo 1624
4.8Overall Elo 1587
ELO gap
5.2Overall Elo 1601
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.8
Surface form
3.5
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.4
Minutes 14d
7.3
7.0
3-set count
4.0
6.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Misolic F.
Den Ouden G.
6-46-0
Semi-finals
Misolic F.
Klein L.
7-646-2
Den Ouden G.
Landaluce M.[2]
6-07-65
Quarter-finals
Misolic F.
Rottgering M.
6-26-2
Den Ouden G.
Blockx A.[3]
3-66-46-1
Klein L.
Chazal M.
7-646-3
Landaluce M.[2]
Budkov Kjaer N.
6-46-3
R16
Klein L.
Kukushkin M.[7]
W/O
Blockx A.[3]
Choinski J.
4-66-27-61
Landaluce M.[2]
Evans D.
6-36-3
Chazal M.
Brunclik P.
6-46-3
Rottgering M.
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
6-26-2
Misolic F.
Basilashvili N.[5]
6-07-5
Den Ouden G.
Barton H.
6-36-2
Budkov Kjaer N.
Hemery C.
6-26-3
R32
Brunclik P.
Mochizuki S.[1]
6-34-66-2
Klein L.
Holmgren A.
6-37-5
Kukushkin M.[7]
Mrva M.
6-05-76-4
Rottgering M.
Rincon D.
6-47-65
Misolic F.
Kumstat J.
6-47-5
Barton H.
Neumayer L.
4-66-16-2
Choinski J.
Rocha H.
6-37-5
Blockx A.[3]
Habib H.
6-46-2
Budkov Kjaer N.
Moro Canas A.[6]
7-56-1
Landaluce M.[2]
Rodionov J.
5-76-27-5
Chazal M.
Zhukayev B.
4-67-57-5
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
Popko D.[4]
7-634-66-2
Evans D.
Harris L.
6-17-5
Basilashvili N.[5]
Cornut Chauvinc A.
6-21-66-4
Hemery C.
Sachko V.
6-47-5
Den Ouden G.
Nagal S.[8]
6-16-1