Martin Landaluce vs Daniel Evans — Prague CH Round of 16

Prague CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Martin Landaluce
ESP2
Martin Landaluce
1727ELO
1654Clay ELO
$742kYTD
$1.5MCAREER
20 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 5 May 2025
clay
Daniel Evans
GBR
Daniel Evans
#501ATP
1588ELO
1499Clay ELO
36 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLLLLL
Landaluce M.
6-3 6-3
Evans D.
Landaluce M.
662
Evans D.
330

Martin Landaluce defeated Daniel Evans 6-3 6-3 in the Prague CH round of 16 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Landaluce M.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Evans D.

Evans D.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Landaluce M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Landaluce M.Evans D.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Even
62%
61%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
62%
53%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.2
3.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
4.5
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (96 vs 47). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Landaluce M.Evans D.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
59
73
Break points saved·Slight edge
92
97
Break points won·Dominant
17
61
Deciding sets·Slight edge
89
82
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
58
66

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Landaluce M.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Evans D.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.5+155 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.5Clay Elo 1499
6.1Overall Elo 1727
ELO gap
3.9Overall Elo 1588
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.1
Surface form
4.1
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
5.1
Minutes 14d
8.7
0.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Landaluce M.Evans D.
Freshness·Even
100
100

Landaluce M.: 15 days rest · Evans D.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Misolic F.
Den Ouden G.
6-46-0
Semi-finals
Misolic F.
Klein L.
7-646-2
Den Ouden G.
Landaluce M.[2]
6-07-65
Quarter-finals
Misolic F.
Rottgering M.
6-26-2
Den Ouden G.
Blockx A.[3]
3-66-46-1
Klein L.
Chazal M.
7-646-3
Landaluce M.[2]
Budkov Kjaer N.
6-46-3
R16
Klein L.
Kukushkin M.[7]
W/O
Blockx A.[3]
Choinski J.
4-66-27-61
Landaluce M.[2]
Evans D.
6-36-3
Chazal M.
Brunclik P.
6-46-3
Rottgering M.
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
6-26-2
Misolic F.
Basilashvili N.[5]
6-07-5
Den Ouden G.
Barton H.
6-36-2
Budkov Kjaer N.
Hemery C.
6-26-3
R32
Brunclik P.
Mochizuki S.[1]
6-34-66-2
Klein L.
Holmgren A.
6-37-5
Kukushkin M.[7]
Mrva M.
6-05-76-4
Rottgering M.
Rincon D.
6-47-65
Misolic F.
Kumstat J.
6-47-5
Barton H.
Neumayer L.
4-66-16-2
Choinski J.
Rocha H.
6-37-5
Blockx A.[3]
Habib H.
6-46-2
Budkov Kjaer N.
Moro Canas A.[6]
7-56-1
Landaluce M.[2]
Rodionov J.
5-76-27-5
Chazal M.
Zhukayev B.
4-67-57-5
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
Popko D.[4]
7-634-66-2
Evans D.
Harris L.
6-17-5
Basilashvili N.[5]
Cornut Chauvinc A.
6-21-66-4
Hemery C.
Sachko V.
6-47-5
Den Ouden G.
Nagal S.[8]
6-16-1