Martin Landaluce vs Benjamin Hassan — Mauthausen CH Round of 32

Mauthausen CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Martin Landaluce
ESP
Martin Landaluce
1727ELO
1654Clay ELO
$742kYTD
$1.5MCAREER
20 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWLWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 28 April 2025
clay
Benjamin Hassan
LBN
Benjamin Hassan
#463ATP
1451ELO
1452Clay ELO
31 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLWLW
Landaluce M.
7-5 5-7 7-6
Hassan B.
Landaluce M.
75772
Hassan B.
57611

Martin Landaluce defeated Benjamin Hassan 7-5 5-7 7-6 in the Mauthausen CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Martin Landaluce came in defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Landaluce M.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Hassan B.

Hassan B.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Landaluce M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Landaluce M.Hassan B.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
53%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Even
62%
60%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
63%
56%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.1
5.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
4.4
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (96 vs 77). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Landaluce M.Hassan B.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
59
42
Break points saved·Clear edge
92
68
Break points won·Even
17
17
Deciding sets·Clear edge
89
67
Tiebreaks·Even
58
62

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Landaluce M.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Hassan B.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.7+202 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.3Clay Elo 1452
8.4Overall Elo 1727
ELO gap
1.6Overall Elo 1451
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.3
Surface form
4.9
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
7.5
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Landaluce M.Hassan B.
Freshness·Even
100
100

Landaluce M.: 15 days rest · Hassan B.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Garin C.
Barrios Vera T.[5]
3-66-16-4
Semi-finals
Barrios Vera T.[5]
Kym J.[7]
6-37-5
Garin C.
Burruchaga R.
3-66-46-0
Quarter-finals
Kym J.[7]
Blockx A.
W/O
Barrios Vera T.[5]
Trungelliti M.
6-26-4
Garin C.
Oberleitner N.
6-26-766-4
Burruchaga R.
Tirante T.[8]
7-54-66-3
R16
Burruchaga R.
Mochizuki S.
6-46-2
Blockx A.
Seyboth Wild T.
7-54-66-3
Kym J.[7]
Neumayer L.
7-656-0
Trungelliti M.
Gigante M.
4-67-6106-3
Barrios Vera T.[5]
Landaluce M.
6-35-76-4
Garin C.
Gaubas V.
3-66-36-4
Oberleitner N.
Schwaerzler J.
6-47-62
Tirante T.[8]
Misolic F.
7-636-3
R32
Tirante T.[8]
Brunold M.
7-56-4
Barrios Vera T.[5]
Rodionov J.
6-33-66-3
Gaubas V.
Paul J.
3-66-46-4
Schwaerzler J.
Paroulek T.
6-37-5
Oberleitner N.
Fognini F.[4]
5-76-36-2
Misolic F.
Basilashvili N.
7-656-756-4
Burruchaga R.
Kuzmanov D.
6-26-2
Mochizuki S.
Monteiro T.[2]
6-36-3
Landaluce M.
Hassan B.
7-55-77-61
Seyboth Wild T.
Moro Canas A.
6-27-67
Blockx A.
Fatic N.
7-57-5
Neumayer L.
Budkov Kjaer N.
7-57-5
Kym J.[7]
Pichler D.
6-16-3
Gigante M.
Cilic M.[3]
4-66-17-64
Trungelliti M.
Skatov T.
7-56-4
Garin C.
Daniel T.[6]
6-06-1