Filip Peliwo vs Hyeon Chung — Guangzhou CH Qualifying Round 1

Guangzhou CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
Filip Peliwo
POL
Filip Peliwo
#509ATP
1234ELO
1211Hard ELO
32 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 28 April 2025
hard
KOR7
Hyeon Chung
#573ATP
1488ELO
1459Hard ELO
30 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWWLW
Peliwo F.
6-2 6-4
Chung H.
Peliwo F.
662
Chung H.
240

Filip Peliwo defeated Hyeon Chung 6-2 6-4 in the Guangzhou CH qualifying round 1 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Peliwo F.serving58% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Chung H.

Chung H.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Peliwo F.

Serve advantage — Chung H.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Peliwo F.Chung H.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
44%
46%
Service points won·Even
57%
57%
Return points won·Slight edge
37%
44%
Break points saved·Even
56%
56%
Aces / match·Even
2.1
1.9
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.2
5.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (23 vs 46). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Peliwo F.Chung H.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
0
24
Break points saved·Dominant
23
69
Break points won·Dominant
11
43
Deciding sets·Slight edge
10
21
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
36
15

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Peliwo F.
4.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 259 days (−1.5)
Chung H.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.1
Surface form
5.5
7.03-match win streak
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
4.1
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Q2
Peniston R.[1]
Cukierman D.
6-26-4
Langmo C.[2]
Rai A.[9]
6-34-66-4
Rosenkranz M.[3]
Ramanathan R.[12]
4-66-37-64
Ilagan A.[4]
Sinclair C.
6-37-5
Bouzige M.[5]
Peliwo F.
6-46-2
Mo Y.[11]
Samrej K.[6]
6-26-4
Q1
Samrej K.[6]
Xiao L.
6-726-46-4
Ramanathan R.[12]
Lu P.
6-06-0
Sinclair C.
Delaney J.[10]
6-33-66-4
Peliwo F.
Chung H.[7]
6-26-4
Peniston R.[1]
Zheng Z.
6-26-1
Cukierman D.
Moriya H.[8]
6-736-47-5
Langmo C.[2]
Zeng Y.
7-56-2
Rai A.[9]
Yang Z.
7-627-5
Rosenkranz M.[3]
Leong M.
6-26-4
Ilagan A.[4]
Jones H.
6-16-1
Bouzige M.[5]
Zhu E.
7-56-2
Mo Y.[11]
Delaney J.
4-67-686-2