Alexander Blockx vs Nerman Fatic — Mauthausen CH Round of 32

Mauthausen CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
BEL
Alexander Blockx
#37ATP
1906ELO
1868Clay ELO
$901kYTD
$1.8MCAREER
21 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 28 April 2025
clay
BIH
Nerman Fatic
#396ATP
1496ELO
1478Clay ELO
31 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWLW
Blockx A.
7-5 7-5
Fatic N.
Blockx A.
772
Fatic N.
550

Alexander Blockx defeated Nerman Fatic 7-5 7-5 in the Mauthausen CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Alexander Blockx came in ranked #37.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Blockx A.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Fatic N.

Fatic N.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Blockx A.

Serve advantage — Blockx A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Blockx A.Fatic N.
81
Serve
—
0
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Blockx A.Fatic N.
1st serve in·Even
62%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
51%
Service points won·Even
66%
62%
Return points won·Even
39%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
58%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.5
4.2
Double faults / match·Even
1.8
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (107 vs 54). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Blockx A.Fatic N.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
71
24
Break points saved·Dominant
97
63
Break points won·Slight edge
27
36
Deciding sets·Dominant
95
24
Tiebreaks·Dominant
87
35

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Blockx A.
7.6
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Fatic N.
3.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 42 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
9.7+390 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.3Clay Elo 1478
9.9Overall Elo 1906
ELO gap
0.1Overall Elo 1496
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.1
Surface form
4.1
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.2
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Blockx A.Fatic N.
Freshness·
95
—

Blockx A.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Garin C.
Barrios Vera T.[5]
3-66-16-4
Semi-finals
Barrios Vera T.[5]
Kym J.[7]
6-37-5
Garin C.
Burruchaga R.
3-66-46-0
Quarter-finals
Kym J.[7]
Blockx A.
W/O
Barrios Vera T.[5]
Trungelliti M.
6-26-4
Garin C.
Oberleitner N.
6-26-766-4
Burruchaga R.
Tirante T.[8]
7-54-66-3
R16
Burruchaga R.
Mochizuki S.
6-46-2
Blockx A.
Seyboth Wild T.
7-54-66-3
Kym J.[7]
Neumayer L.
7-656-0
Trungelliti M.
Gigante M.
4-67-6106-3
Barrios Vera T.[5]
Landaluce M.
6-35-76-4
Garin C.
Gaubas V.
3-66-36-4
Oberleitner N.
Schwaerzler J.
6-47-62
Tirante T.[8]
Misolic F.
7-636-3
R32
Tirante T.[8]
Brunold M.
7-56-4
Barrios Vera T.[5]
Rodionov J.
6-33-66-3
Gaubas V.
Paul J.
3-66-46-4
Schwaerzler J.
Paroulek T.
6-37-5
Oberleitner N.
Fognini F.[4]
5-76-36-2
Misolic F.
Basilashvili N.
7-656-756-4
Burruchaga R.
Kuzmanov D.
6-26-2
Mochizuki S.
Monteiro T.[2]
6-36-3
Landaluce M.
Hassan B.
7-55-77-61
Seyboth Wild T.
Moro Canas A.
6-27-67
Blockx A.
Fatic N.
7-57-5
Neumayer L.
Budkov Kjaer N.
7-57-5
Kym J.[7]
Pichler D.
6-16-3
Gigante M.
Cilic M.[3]
4-66-17-64
Trungelliti M.
Skatov T.
7-56-4
Garin C.
Daniel T.[6]
6-06-1