Bernard Tomic vs Michael Mmoh — Savannah CH Round of 32

Savannah CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Bernard Tomic
AUS8
Bernard Tomic
#206ATP
1475ELO
1420Clay ELO
$117kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
33 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 21 April 2025
clay
Michael Mmoh
USA
Michael Mmoh
#188ATP
1613ELO
1508Clay ELO
$85kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWWWL
Tomic B.
6-4 0-6 6-2
Mmoh M.
Tomic B.
6062
Mmoh M.
4621

Bernard Tomic defeated Michael Mmoh 6-4 0-6 6-2 in the Savannah CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Michael Mmoh came in ranked #188, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

  • Match story: Bernard Tomic closed it out in three sets, 6–4 0–6 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tomic B.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Mmoh M.

Mmoh M.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Tomic B.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tomic B.Mmoh M.
1st serve in·Even
62%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
72%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
51%
46%
Service points won·Even
64%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.6
6.2
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.6
4.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (94 vs 66). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tomic B.Mmoh M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
53
66
Break points saved·Even
92
91
Break points won·Dominant
4
31
Deciding sets·Clear edge
74
90
Tiebreaks·Even
79
77

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tomic B.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Mmoh M.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.1Clay Elo 1420
Surface ELO
5.9+88 Clay Elo edge
3.7Overall Elo 1475
ELO gap
6.3Overall Elo 1613
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.0
Surface form
4.3
Fatigue & Travel
7.5
Minutes 14d
5.5
7.0
3-set count
4.0
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tomic B.Mmoh M.
Freshness·Slight edge
84
95

Tomic B.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 45 games (7d) · Mmoh M.: 13 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Mejia N.
Draxl L.[4]
2-66-27-63
Semi-finals
Mejia N.
Spizzirri E.[1]
6-45-76-3
Draxl L.[4]
Olivieri G.
7-56-4
Quarter-finals
Olivieri G.
Martin A.
6-46-2
Spizzirri E.[1]
Kozlov S.
6-37-5
Mejia N.
Wu T.
6-23-67-64
Draxl L.[4]
Crawford O.
6-36-776-2
R16
Spizzirri E.[1]
Perez A.
6-36-1
Mejia N.
Schwaerzler J.
6-46-0
Wu T.
Martineau M.
6-26-3
Draxl L.[4]
Maloney P.
7-57-5
Martin A.
Tomic B.[8]
6-26-3
Olivieri G.
Andrade A.
6-36-3
Kozlov S.
Blancaneaux G.
6-13-1
Crawford O.
Reis Da Silva J.
6-34-66-4
R32
Martineau M.
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
5-76-46-0
Reis Da Silva J.
Popko D.[5]
6-47-5
Crawford O.
Denolly C.
6-24-66-3
Olivieri G.
Erhard M.
7-57-61
Andrade A.
Gomez F.[2]
6-16-1
Spizzirri E.[1]
Seggerman R.
6-46-4
Perez A.
Kypson P.
6-43-66-3
Blancaneaux G.
Brooksby J.[6]
6-46-3
Schwaerzler J.
Nava E.[3]
6-36-4
Mejia N.
Janvier M.
7-57-5
Maloney P.
Mayo A.
6-36-3
Martin A.
Rodesch C.
7-663-67-63
Wu T.
Mccormick T.
6-36-2
Draxl L.[4]
Johns G.
7-56-1
Tomic B.[8]
Mmoh M.
6-40-66-2
Kozlov S.
Wiskandt M.
6-26-1