Nicolas Mejia vs Tung Lin Wu — Savannah CH Quarter-final

Savannah CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Nicolas Mejia
COL
Nicolas Mejia
#133ATP
1477ELO
1488Clay ELO
$142kYTD
$524kCAREER
26 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWLWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 21 April 2025
clay
Tung Lin Wu
TPE
Tung Lin Wu
#329ATP
1406ELO
1421Clay ELO
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLLW
Mejia N.
6-2 3-6 7-6
Wu T.
Mejia N.
63772
Wu T.
26641

Nicolas Mejia defeated Tung Lin Wu 6-2 3-6 7-6 in the Savannah CH quarter-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Nicolas Mejia came in ranked #133.

Key context

  • Match story: Nicolas Mejia closed it out in three sets, 6–2 3–6 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mejia N.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Wu T.

Wu T.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Mejia N.

Serve advantage — Wu T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mejia N.Wu T.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
68%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Even
62%
64%
Return points won·Even
39%
40%
Break points saved·Even
62%
64%
Aces / match·Even
4.1
3.7
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.1
1.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (96 vs 73). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mejia N.Wu T.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
26
10
Break points saved·Slight edge
74
84
Break points won·Even
6
6
Deciding sets·Dominant
40
6
Tiebreaks·Dominant
38
4

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mejia N.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Wu T.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.2+67 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.8Clay Elo 1421
6.3Overall Elo 1477
ELO gap
3.7Overall Elo 1406
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.1
Surface form
4.5
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
5.5
Minutes 14d
6.5
7.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Mejia N.Wu T.
Freshness·Dominant
55
80

Mejia N.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 116 games (7d) · Wu T.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Mejia N.
Draxl L.[4]
2-66-27-63
Semi-finals
Mejia N.
Spizzirri E.[1]
6-45-76-3
Draxl L.[4]
Olivieri G.
7-56-4
Quarter-finals
Olivieri G.
Martin A.
6-46-2
Spizzirri E.[1]
Kozlov S.
6-37-5
Mejia N.
Wu T.
6-23-67-64
Draxl L.[4]
Crawford O.
6-36-776-2
R16
Spizzirri E.[1]
Perez A.
6-36-1
Mejia N.
Schwaerzler J.
6-46-0
Wu T.
Martineau M.
6-26-3
Draxl L.[4]
Maloney P.
7-57-5
Martin A.
Tomic B.[8]
6-26-3
Olivieri G.
Andrade A.
6-36-3
Kozlov S.
Blancaneaux G.
6-13-1
Crawford O.
Reis Da Silva J.
6-34-66-4
R32
Martineau M.
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
5-76-46-0
Reis Da Silva J.
Popko D.[5]
6-47-5
Crawford O.
Denolly C.
6-24-66-3
Olivieri G.
Erhard M.
7-57-61
Andrade A.
Gomez F.[2]
6-16-1
Spizzirri E.[1]
Seggerman R.
6-46-4
Perez A.
Kypson P.
6-43-66-3
Blancaneaux G.
Brooksby J.[6]
6-46-3
Schwaerzler J.
Nava E.[3]
6-36-4
Mejia N.
Janvier M.
7-57-5
Maloney P.
Mayo A.
6-36-3
Martin A.
Rodesch C.
7-663-67-63
Wu T.
Mccormick T.
6-36-2
Draxl L.[4]
Johns G.
7-56-1
Tomic B.[8]
Mmoh M.
6-40-66-2
Kozlov S.
Wiskandt M.
6-26-1