Jason Kubler vs Alibek Kachmazov — Gwangju CH Final

Gwangju CH · CHALLENGER · Final
AUS
Jason Kubler
#468ATP
1685ELO
1635Hard ELO
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWWLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 21 April 2025
hard
RUS
Alibek Kachmazov
#782ATP
1490ELO
1467Hard ELO
23 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWLL
Kubler J.
7-5 6-7 6-3
Kachmazov A.
Kubler J.
76762
Kachmazov A.
57931

Jason Kubler defeated Alibek Kachmazov 7-5 6-7 6-3 in the Gwangju CH final on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Jason Kubler closed it out in three sets, 7–5 6–7 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kubler J.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Kachmazov A.

Kachmazov A.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Kubler J.

Serve advantage — Kubler J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kubler J.Kachmazov A.
1st serve in·Even
62%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
75%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
66%
61%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Even
60%
60%
Aces / match·Even
6.7
6.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.4
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (38 vs 39). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kubler J.Kachmazov A.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
59
49
Break points saved·Slight edge
90
82
Break points won·Dominant
46
16
Deciding sets·Clear edge
79
61
Tiebreaks·Dominant
37
87

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kubler J.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Kachmazov A.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.1+169 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.9Hard Elo 1467
7.4Overall Elo 1685
ELO gap
2.6Overall Elo 1490
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
7.9
Surface form
3.6
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
5.3
Minutes 14d
8.4
7.0
3-set count
7.0
4.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
7.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Kubler J.
Kachmazov A.
7-56-776-3
Semi-finals
Kubler J.
Schoolkate T.[4]
7-56-4
Kachmazov A.
Watanuki Y.
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Kachmazov A.
Jasika O.
6-46-2
Watanuki Y.
Holt B.[3]
7-57-62
Kubler J.
Grenier H.
6-26-1
Schoolkate T.[4]
Chung H.
6-36-1
R16
Grenier H.
Uchiyama Y.
W/O
Kubler J.
Walton A.[1]
6-46-1
Jasika O.
Escoffier A.
4-67-56-1
Schoolkate T.[4]
Simakin I.
6-46-2
Holt B.[3]
Park U.
3-66-37-65
Chung H.
Trotter J.[6]
6-27-61
Watanuki Y.
Monday J.
6-36-776-4
Kachmazov A.
Noguchi R.
7-636-4
R32
Walton A.[1]
Sharipov M.
6-36-2
Trotter J.[6]
Durasovic V.
6-756-46-3
Watanuki Y.
Mccabe J.[8]
7-6126-3
Monday J.
Svajda Z.
6-26-4
Escoffier A.
Eubanks C.[2]
6-36-4
Kachmazov A.
Atmane T.[7]
7-610-0
Grenier H.
Tu L.[5]
6-46-2
Kubler J.
Kwon S.
6-36-4
Uchiyama Y.
Uchida K.
7-53-66-4
Simakin I.
Ruusuvuori E.
6-26-3
Jasika O.
Zhou Y.
7-624-66-2
Chung H.
Lestienne C.
6-16-4
Park U.
Chung Y.
4-66-36-4
Holt B.[3]
Hsu Y.
6-36-0
Schoolkate T.[4]
Sakamoto R.
7-647-5
Noguchi R.
Shimabukuro S.
6-46-0