Brandon Holt vs Yu Hsiou Hsu — Gwangju CH Round of 32

Gwangju CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA3
Brandon Holt
#657ATP
1537ELO
1507Hard ELO
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 April 2025
hard
Yu Hsiou Hsu
TPE
Yu Hsiou Hsu
#210ATP
1489ELO
1468Hard ELO
27 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWLW
Holt B.
6-3 6-0
Hsu Y.
Holt B.
662
Hsu Y.
300

Brandon Holt defeated Yu Hsiou Hsu 6-3 6-0 in the Gwangju CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Yu Hsiou Hsu came in ranked #210, defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Holt B.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Hsu Y.

Hsu Y.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Holt B.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Holt B.Hsu Y.
1st serve in·Even
68%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
51%
Service points won·Even
64%
61%
Return points won·Even
38%
40%
Break points saved·Even
62%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.5
2.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
0.9
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (75 vs 80). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Holt B.Hsu Y.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
58
36
Break points saved·Slight edge
85
74
Break points won·Dominant
31
4
Deciding sets·Dominant
79
50
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
69
77

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Holt B.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Hsu Y.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.2+39 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.8Hard Elo 1468
5.2Overall Elo 1537
ELO gap
4.8Overall Elo 1489
3.9No prior meetings
H2H
6.1
5.6
Surface form
5.2
Fatigue & Travel
5.3
Minutes 14d
7.7
4.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
7.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Kubler J.
Kachmazov A.
7-56-776-3
Semi-finals
Kubler J.
Schoolkate T.[4]
7-56-4
Kachmazov A.
Watanuki Y.
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Kachmazov A.
Jasika O.
6-46-2
Watanuki Y.
Holt B.[3]
7-57-62
Kubler J.
Grenier H.
6-26-1
Schoolkate T.[4]
Chung H.
6-36-1
R16
Grenier H.
Uchiyama Y.
W/O
Kubler J.
Walton A.[1]
6-46-1
Jasika O.
Escoffier A.
4-67-56-1
Schoolkate T.[4]
Simakin I.
6-46-2
Holt B.[3]
Park U.
3-66-37-65
Chung H.
Trotter J.[6]
6-27-61
Watanuki Y.
Monday J.
6-36-776-4
Kachmazov A.
Noguchi R.
7-636-4
R32
Walton A.[1]
Sharipov M.
6-36-2
Trotter J.[6]
Durasovic V.
6-756-46-3
Watanuki Y.
Mccabe J.[8]
7-6126-3
Monday J.
Svajda Z.
6-26-4
Escoffier A.
Eubanks C.[2]
6-36-4
Kachmazov A.
Atmane T.[7]
7-610-0
Grenier H.
Tu L.[5]
6-46-2
Kubler J.
Kwon S.
6-36-4
Uchiyama Y.
Uchida K.
7-53-66-4
Simakin I.
Ruusuvuori E.
6-26-3
Jasika O.
Zhou Y.
7-624-66-2
Chung H.
Lestienne C.
6-16-4
Park U.
Chung Y.
4-66-36-4
Holt B.[3]
Hsu Y.
6-36-0
Schoolkate T.[4]
Sakamoto R.
7-647-5
Noguchi R.
Shimabukuro S.
6-46-0