Omar Jasika vs Antoine Escoffier — Gwangju CH Round of 16

Gwangju CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
AUS
Omar Jasika
#528ATP
1296ELO
1272Hard ELO
29 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 21 April 2025
hard
FRA
Antoine Escoffier
#753ATP
1436ELO
1413Hard ELO
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWLL
Jasika O.
4-6 7-5 6-1
Escoffier A.
Jasika O.
4762
Escoffier A.
6511

Omar Jasika defeated Antoine Escoffier 4-6 7-5 6-1 in the Gwangju CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Jasika O.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Escoffier A.

Escoffier A.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Jasika O.

Serve advantage — Escoffier A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Jasika O.Escoffier A.
1st serve in·Slight edge
66%
56%
1st serve points won·Even
63%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
48%
Service points won·Even
58%
59%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Even
58%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.7
3.9
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.7
4.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (64 vs 36). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Jasika O.Escoffier A.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
0
10
Break points saved·Clear edge
47
68
Break points won·Slight edge
13
18
Deciding sets·Even
13
12
Tiebreaks·Even
1
3

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Jasika O.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
Escoffier A.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.6Hard Elo 1272
Surface ELO
6.4+142 Hard Elo edge
3.6Overall Elo 1296
ELO gap
6.4Overall Elo 1436
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
6.9
Surface form
1.9
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
7.5
Minutes 14d
8.7
4.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Kubler J.
Kachmazov A.
7-56-776-3
Semi-finals
Kubler J.
Schoolkate T.[4]
7-56-4
Kachmazov A.
Watanuki Y.
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Kachmazov A.
Jasika O.
6-46-2
Watanuki Y.
Holt B.[3]
7-57-62
Kubler J.
Grenier H.
6-26-1
Schoolkate T.[4]
Chung H.
6-36-1
R16
Grenier H.
Uchiyama Y.
W/O
Kubler J.
Walton A.[1]
6-46-1
Jasika O.
Escoffier A.
4-67-56-1
Schoolkate T.[4]
Simakin I.
6-46-2
Holt B.[3]
Park U.
3-66-37-65
Chung H.
Trotter J.[6]
6-27-61
Watanuki Y.
Monday J.
6-36-776-4
Kachmazov A.
Noguchi R.
7-636-4
R32
Walton A.[1]
Sharipov M.
6-36-2
Trotter J.[6]
Durasovic V.
6-756-46-3
Watanuki Y.
Mccabe J.[8]
7-6126-3
Monday J.
Svajda Z.
6-26-4
Escoffier A.
Eubanks C.[2]
6-36-4
Kachmazov A.
Atmane T.[7]
7-610-0
Grenier H.
Tu L.[5]
6-46-2
Kubler J.
Kwon S.
6-36-4
Uchiyama Y.
Uchida K.
7-53-66-4
Simakin I.
Ruusuvuori E.
6-26-3
Jasika O.
Zhou Y.
7-624-66-2
Chung H.
Lestienne C.
6-16-4
Park U.
Chung Y.
4-66-36-4
Holt B.[3]
Hsu Y.
6-36-0
Schoolkate T.[4]
Sakamoto R.
7-647-5
Noguchi R.
Shimabukuro S.
6-46-0