Hady Habib vs Mika Brunold — Rome CH Round of 32

Rome CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
LIB3
Hady Habib
#650ATP
1412ELO
1435Clay ELO
27 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 April 2025
clay
SUI
Mika Brunold
#414ATP
1466ELO
1407Clay ELO
21 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWWWLW
Habib H.
6-4 7-5
Brunold M.
Habib H.
672
Brunold M.
450

Hady Habib defeated Mika Brunold 6-4 7-5 in the Rome CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Habib H.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Brunold M.

Brunold M.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Habib H.

Serve advantage — Brunold M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Habib H.Brunold M.
1st serve in·Even
63%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
52%
Service points won·Even
63%
62%
Return points won·Slight edge
35%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
9.4
2.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.5
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (52 vs 71). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Habib H.Brunold M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
44
24
Break points saved·Clear edge
92
72
Break points won·Clear edge
1
15
Deciding sets·Dominant
56
3
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
78
92

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Habib H.
4.4
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 33 days (−0.7)
Brunold M.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.2+29 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.8Clay Elo 1407
4.2Overall Elo 1412
ELO gap
5.8Overall Elo 1466
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.9
Surface form
5.1
0.0Lost last 5
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
5.7
3-set count
4.0
Prev. match
8.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Gigante M.[7]
Gaubas V.[1]
6-23-66-4
Semi-finals
Gigante M.[7]
Kopp S.
W/O
Gaubas V.[1]
Neumayer L.[5]
4-66-36-1
Quarter-finals
Gigante M.[7]
Maestrelli F.
6-766-16-3
Kopp S.
Arnaboldi F.[8]
6-26-4
Neumayer L.[5]
Skatov T.[4]
6-37-63
Gaubas V.[1]
Pellegrino A.
6-34-66-4
R16
Skatov T.[4]
Travaglia S.
W/O
Pellegrino A.
Bertola R.
1-66-36-4
Gaubas V.[1]
Prihodko O.
6-26-2
Neumayer L.[5]
Pokorny L.
6-26-1
Arnaboldi F.[8]
Kuzmanov D.
6-32-66-2
Maestrelli F.
Carboni L.
3-66-46-2
Kopp S.
Habib H.[3]
7-57-63
Gigante M.[7]
Coppejans K.
5-76-46-1
R32
Pellegrino A.
Vasami J.
5-76-46-4
Pokorny L.
Hardt N.
6-46-3
Travaglia S.
Jubb P.
6-46-2
Habib H.[3]
Brunold M.
6-47-5
Gigante M.[7]
Giustino L.
3-66-16-2
Maestrelli F.
Squire H.
7-52-67-63
Bertola R.
Bouquier A.[6]
7-656-1
Arnaboldi F.[8]
Pennaforti G.
6-35-76-2
Kopp S.
Yevseyev D.
6-46-4
Coppejans K.
Stricker D.
6-26-2
Gaubas V.[1]
Sultanov K.
3-66-46-2
Prihodko O.
Roca Batalla O.
5-77-666-3
Carboni L.
Ajdukovic D.[2]
3-66-16-4
Kuzmanov D.
Shelbayh A.
6-46-2
Skatov T.[4]
Cornut Chauvinc A.
7-616-4
Neumayer L.[5]
Poljicak M.
6-46-4