Andrea Collarini vs Facundo Bagnis — San Miguel de Tucuman CH Quarter-final

San Miguel de Tucuman CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Andrea Collarini
ARG1
Andrea Collarini
#340ATP
1426ELO
1411Clay ELO
34 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWLLWL
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Monday, 21 April 2025
clay
ARG
Facundo Bagnis
#431ATP
1591ELO
1584Clay ELO
36 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
Collarini A.
3-6 7-6 4-5
Bagnis F.
Collarini A.
3774–
Bagnis F.
6635–

Andrea Collarini advanced when Facundo Bagnis retired 3-6 7-6 4-5 in the San Miguel de Tucuman CH quarter-final. Andrea Collarini claimed a first win over Facundo Bagnis in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-02-22CordobaQ2clayFacundo Bagnis7-6(5) 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Collarini A.serving68% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Bagnis F.

Bagnis F.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Collarini A.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Collarini A.Bagnis F.
1st serve in·Even
68%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
51%
Service points won·Even
60%
63%
Return points won·Even
42%
39%
Break points saved·Even
57%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.5
4.4
Double faults / match·Even
2.6
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (86 vs 28). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Collarini A.Bagnis F.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
11
54
Break points saved·Dominant
54
92
Break points won·Slight edge
43
35
Deciding sets·Dominant
8
89
Tiebreaks·Even
7
3

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Collarini A.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Bagnis F.
4.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 259 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
3.0Clay Elo 1411
Surface ELO
7.0+173 Clay Elo edge
3.1Overall Elo 1426
ELO gap
6.9Overall Elo 1591
5.0
H2H
5.0
6.7
Surface form
6.6
7.03-match win streak
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
5.4
Minutes 14d
4.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Barrena A.
Rodriguez Taverna S.[4]
7-56-2
Semi-finals
Rodriguez Taverna S.[4]
Collarini A.[1]
7-676-3
Barrena A.
Dellien Velasco M.[3]
6-747-636-2
Quarter-finals
Collarini A.[1]
Bagnis F.
3-67-634-5
Rodriguez Taverna S.[4]
Torres J.[5]
6-37-64
Dellien Velasco M.[3]
Boscardin Dias P.
1-66-36-1
Barrena A.
Kestelboim M.
6-06-2
R16
Collarini A.[1]
Ambrogi L.
6-27-66
Dellien Velasco M.[3]
Huertas Del Pino C.
6-46-2
Bagnis F.
Olivo R.[8]
7-55-76-3
Rodriguez Taverna S.[4]
Justo G.
6-46-3
Torres J.[5]
Aboian V.
6-26-2
Barrena A.
Roncadelli F.[7]
6-46-3
Kestelboim M.
Tenti F.
7-56-3
Boscardin Dias P.
Midon L.[6]
4-66-36-4
R32
Boscardin Dias P.
Gimenez I.
6-36-3
Tenti F.
Lingua Lavallen A.
3-66-16-3
Collarini A.[1]
La Serna J.
6-46-2
Ambrogi L.
Pereira J.
6-756-36-3
Rodriguez Taverna S.[4]
Estevez J.
6-16-1
Aboian V.
Orlov V.
6-46-4
Torres J.[5]
Monzon I.
6-26-4
Dellien Velasco M.[3]
Zeitune M.
6-36-2
Kestelboim M.
Guillen Meza A.[2]
6-13-66-2
Olivo R.[8]
Casanova H.
6-41-67-5
Huertas Del Pino C.
Rodriguez L.
6-43-67-66
Barrena A.
Kicker N.
6-46-2
Midon L.[6]
Schiessl J.
6-36-4
Roncadelli F.[7]
Zanellato N.
6-17-5
Bagnis F.
Villanueva G.
6-46-1
Justo G.
Barreiros Reyes M.
7-676-3