Emilio Nava vs Tung Lin Wu — Tallahassee CH Round of 16

Tallahassee CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Emilio Nava
USA6
Emilio Nava
#91ATP
1704ELO
1686Clay ELO
$533kYTD
$2.1MCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 14 April 2025
clay
Tung Lin Wu
TPE
Tung Lin Wu
#329ATP
1406ELO
1421Clay ELO
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLLW
Nava E.
6-4 6-4
Wu T.
Nava E.
662
Wu T.
440

Emilio Nava defeated Tung Lin Wu 6-4 6-4 in the Tallahassee CH round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Emilio Nava came in ranked #91.

Key context

  • Match story: Emilio Nava edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nava E.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Wu T.

Wu T.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Nava E.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Nava E.Wu T.
22
Serve
—
1
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Nava E.Wu T.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
68%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Even
65%
64%
Return points won·Even
38%
40%
Break points saved·Even
65%
64%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.6
3.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.0
1.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (120 vs 73). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nava E.Wu T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
52
10
Break points saved·Slight edge
94
84
Break points won·Slight edge
17
6
Deciding sets·Dominant
89
6
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
23
4

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Nava E.
8.3
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Wu T.
4.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.9+265 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.1Clay Elo 1421
8.3Overall Elo 1704
ELO gap
1.7Overall Elo 1406
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
10.0
Surface form
4.0
10.017-match win streak
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
5.2
Minutes 14d
8.2
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Nava E.Wu T.
Freshness·Clear edge
100
80

Nava E.: 15 days rest · Wu T.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Rodesch C.
Nava E.[6]
4-66-36-4
Semi-finals
Nava E.[6]
Erhard M.
6-26-4
Rodesch C.
Collarini A.
6-21-66-4
Quarter-finals
Rodesch C.
Andrade A.
6-47-5
Nava E.[6]
Cassone M.
6-26-3
Erhard M.
Krueger M.[3]
4-67-637-63
Collarini A.
Reis Da Silva J.
6-46-2
R16
Cassone M.
Schwaerzler J.
6-37-66
Collarini A.
Draxl L.[8]
6-36-0
Nava E.[6]
Wu T.
6-46-4
Krueger M.[3]
Blancaneaux G.
0-67-657-64
Erhard M.
Maloney P.
3-66-07-5
Reis Da Silva J.
Galarneau A.
7-646-776-2
Rodesch C.
Popko D.[5]
6-37-65
Andrade A.
Mmoh M.
7-651-66-1
R32
Nava E.[6]
Sigsgaard C.
6-46-4
Galarneau A.
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
6-06-0
Reis Da Silva J.
Gomez F.[4]
6-43-2
Mmoh M.
Barrios Vera T.[2]
6-36-3
Wu T.
Bueno G.
6-46-1
Blancaneaux G.
Jianu F.
6-46-4
Krueger M.[3]
Mena F.
6-36-4
Erhard M.
Poling K.
6-25-76-4
Maloney P.
Brooksby J.[7]
6-46-3
Collarini A.
Varillas J.
6-35-76-4
Popko D.[5]
Dutra Da Silva D.
7-626-4
Andrade A.
Vallejo A.
6-26-3
Cassone M.
Spizzirri E.[1]
6-37-5
Rodesch C.
Prado Angelo J.
6-46-1
Schwaerzler J.
Martineau M.
6-46-4
Draxl L.[8]
Montes De La Torre I.
6-45-76-1