Emilio Nava vs Mathys Erhard — Tallahassee CH Semi-final

Tallahassee CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Emilio Nava
USA6
Emilio Nava
#91ATP
1704ELO
1686Clay ELO
$533kYTD
$2.1MCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 14 April 2025
clay
FRA
Mathys Erhard
#357ATP
1382ELO
1351Clay ELO
24 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWLW
Nava E.
6-2 6-4
Erhard M.
Nava E.
662
Erhard M.
240

Emilio Nava defeated Mathys Erhard 6-2 6-4 in the Tallahassee CH semi-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Emilio Nava came in ranked #91.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nava E.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Erhard M.

Erhard M.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Nava E.

Serve advantage — Nava E.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Nava E.Erhard M.
23
Serve
—
3
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Nava E.Erhard M.
1st serve in·Even
63%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
47%
Service points won·Even
65%
61%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Even
65%
62%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.6
3.8
Double faults / match·Even
3.0
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (120 vs 69). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nava E.Erhard M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
52
23
Break points saved·Clear edge
94
73
Break points won·Even
17
19
Deciding sets·Dominant
89
37
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
23
11

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Nava E.
9.0
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Erhard M.
4.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
9.4+335 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.6Clay Elo 1351
9.5Overall Elo 1704
ELO gap
0.5Overall Elo 1382
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
10.0
Surface form
4.8
10.017-match win streak
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
5.2
Minutes 14d
6.7
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Nava E.Erhard M.
Freshness·Slight edge
100
89

Nava E.: 15 days rest · Erhard M.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 23 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Rodesch C.
Nava E.[6]
4-66-36-4
Semi-finals
Nava E.[6]
Erhard M.
6-26-4
Rodesch C.
Collarini A.
6-21-66-4
Quarter-finals
Rodesch C.
Andrade A.
6-47-5
Nava E.[6]
Cassone M.
6-26-3
Erhard M.
Krueger M.[3]
4-67-637-63
Collarini A.
Reis Da Silva J.
6-46-2
R16
Cassone M.
Schwaerzler J.
6-37-66
Collarini A.
Draxl L.[8]
6-36-0
Nava E.[6]
Wu T.
6-46-4
Krueger M.[3]
Blancaneaux G.
0-67-657-64
Erhard M.
Maloney P.
3-66-07-5
Reis Da Silva J.
Galarneau A.
7-646-776-2
Rodesch C.
Popko D.[5]
6-37-65
Andrade A.
Mmoh M.
7-651-66-1
R32
Nava E.[6]
Sigsgaard C.
6-46-4
Galarneau A.
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
6-06-0
Reis Da Silva J.
Gomez F.[4]
6-43-2
Mmoh M.
Barrios Vera T.[2]
6-36-3
Wu T.
Bueno G.
6-46-1
Blancaneaux G.
Jianu F.
6-46-4
Krueger M.[3]
Mena F.
6-36-4
Erhard M.
Poling K.
6-25-76-4
Maloney P.
Brooksby J.[7]
6-46-3
Collarini A.
Varillas J.
6-35-76-4
Popko D.[5]
Dutra Da Silva D.
7-626-4
Andrade A.
Vallejo A.
6-26-3
Cassone M.
Spizzirri E.[1]
6-37-5
Rodesch C.
Prado Angelo J.
6-46-1
Schwaerzler J.
Martineau M.
6-46-4
Draxl L.[8]
Montes De La Torre I.
6-45-76-1