Juan Pablo Ficovich vs Roberto Cid — San Luis Potosi CH Round of 16

San Luis Potosi CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
ARG
Juan Pablo Ficovich
[4]
#200ATP
1431ELO
1395Clay ELO
$68kYTD
$951kCAREER
29 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10
LLLWLWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 14 April 2025
clay
DOM
Roberto Cid
#579ATP
32 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10
LWLLWLLLLW

Juan Pablo Ficovich defeated Roberto Cid 6-3 6-4 in the San Luis Potosi CH round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Juan Pablo Ficovich came in ranked #200, leading the head-to-head 2–0, defending last year's round of 32. Juan Pablo Ficovich extended the head-to-head to 3–0.

Key context

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ficovich J.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Cid R.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
6.6
Surface form
3.5
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
6.8
Minutes 14d
8.7
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Ficovich J.
662
Cid R.
340

Head to head

2–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-11-29Sao Paulo CHR32clayJuan Pablo Ficovich5-7 6-4 6-0
2019-11-11Champaign-Urbana CHR16hardJuan Pablo Ficovich6-4 7-6(6)

Statistics

Recent form
Ficovich J.Cid R.
60%1st serve in+1%61%
73%1st serve points won+7%66%
55%2nd serve points won+9%46%
66%Service points won+8%58%
39%Return points won+1%38%
63%Break points saved+14%49%
6.2Aces / match+3.42.8
2.5Double faults / match+0.63.1

Averages from each player's recent completed matches (20 vs 20). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Draw

Final
Duckworth J.[1]
Wiskandt M.
6-16-1
Semi-finals
Duckworth J.[1]
Martin D.
7-686-2
Wiskandt M.
Ficovich J.[4]
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Martin D.
Alves M.
7-612-67-5
Wiskandt M.
Rodriguez Taverna S.
3-66-46-3
Duckworth J.[1]
Perez A.
7-676-4
Ficovich J.[4]
Tobon M.
6-06-1
R16
Duckworth J.[1]
Neuchrist M.
6-27-64
Perez A.
Pacheco Mendez R.[5]
7-56-4
Martin D.
Paris T.
7-656-2
Alves M.
Soto M.[6]
6-36-4
Tobon M.
Zahraj P.[8]
4-66-32-0
Ficovich J.[4]
Cid R.
6-36-4
Rodriguez Taverna S.
Mejia N.[7]
7-56-4
Wiskandt M.
Alujas R.
3-67-57-63
R32
Martin D.
Corwin F.
6-16-4
Paris T.
Cressy M.
6-36-4
Alves M.
Aguilar J.
7-656-4
Soto M.[6]
Johns G.
6-37-62
Zahraj P.[8]
Tudorica A.
6-36-1
Tobon M.
Mayo A.
7-56-1
Cid R.
Kingsley C.
6-14-66-4
Ficovich J.[4]
Janvier M.
6-746-26-3
Mejia N.[7]
Hernandez Serrano J.
6-36-2
Rodriguez Taverna S.
Pavlovic L.
6-726-46-4
Alujas R.
Oberleitner N.
7-656-2
Wiskandt M.
Mannarino A.[2]
2-66-27-63
Neuchrist M.
Mccormick T.
6-47-66
Pacheco Mendez R.[5]
Pannu K.
6-26-2
Perez A.
Watt J.
6-47-63
Duckworth J.[1]
De Alba R.
6-16-2