Hyeon Chung vs Li Tu — Busan CH Round of 16

Busan CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
KOR
Hyeon Chung
#573ATP
1488ELO
1459Hard ELO
30 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 14 April 2025
hard
AUS6
Li Tu
#464ATP
1488ELO
1471Hard ELO
30 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
Chung H.
3-6 6-3 6-4
Tu L.
Chung H.
3662
Tu L.
6341

Hyeon Chung defeated Li Tu 3-6 6-3 6-4 in the Busan CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Li Tu came in ranked #464, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

  • Match story: Hyeon Chung dropped the opening set before beating Li Tu 3–6 6–3 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Chung H.serving75% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Tu L.

Tu L.serving75% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Chung H.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Chung H.Tu L.
1st serve in·Even
58%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
65%
75%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
57%
65%
Return points won·Slight edge
44%
36%
Break points saved·Even
57%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
1.8
8.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
5.3
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (46 vs 61). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Chung H.Tu L.
Clutch Rating·Even
24
27
Break points saved·Clear edge
69
82
Break points won·Dominant
43
8
Deciding sets·Even
21
20
Tiebreaks·Dominant
15
64

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Chung H.
3.1
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 168 days (−1.5)
Tu L.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 34 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
4.6Hard Elo 1459
Surface ELO
5.4+12 Hard Elo edge
4.5Overall Elo 1488
ELO gap
5.5Overall Elo 1488
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
2.1
Surface form
6.4
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Atmane T.[8]
Walton A.[1]
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Walton A.[1]
Kubler J.
7-666-737-5
Atmane T.[8]
Holt B.[3]
7-653-66-3
Quarter-finals
Walton A.[1]
Uchiyama Y.[5]
7-55-76-3
Kubler J.
Chung H.
6-26-4
Holt B.[3]
Hsu Y.
6-26-2
Atmane T.[8]
Simakin I.
6-41-66-3
R16
Chung H.
Tu L.[6]
3-66-36-4
Uchiyama Y.[5]
Kwon S.
6-11-67-61
Walton A.[1]
Shimizu Y.
6-27-64
Hsu Y.
Sin S.
6-26-2
Holt B.[3]
Bolt A.
6-36-4
Atmane T.[8]
Jasika O.
6-32-66-4
Simakin I.
Svajda Z.
7-636-1
Kubler J.
Campana Lee G.
6-36-0
R32
Chung H.
Ruusuvuori E.
6-26-4
Tu L.[6]
Sharipov M.
6-23-66-1
Atmane T.[8]
Mccabe J.
7-647-62
Shimizu Y.
Shimabukuro S.
6-36-1
Walton A.[1]
Noguchi R.
6-06-2
Campana Lee G.
Schoolkate T.[4]
6-43-66-3
Hsu Y.
Trotter J.[7]
6-36-3
Bolt A.
Watanuki Y.
6-37-64
Holt B.[3]
Lestienne C.
1-67-626-4
Jasika O.
Durasovic V.
0-66-36-2
Uchiyama Y.[5]
Rosenkranz M.
7-646-3
Svajda Z.
Eubanks C.[2]
3-67-636-0
Kwon S.
Escoffier A.
3-66-17-5
Simakin I.
Kachmazov A.
6-776-46-3
Kubler J.
Sakamoto R.
7-56-4
Sin S.
Monday J.
6-36-4