Brandon Holt vs Alex Bolt — Busan CH Round of 16

Busan CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
USA3
Brandon Holt
#657ATP
1537ELO
1507Hard ELO
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 14 April 2025
hard
Alex Bolt
AUS
Alex Bolt
#166ATP
1588ELO
1541Hard ELO
$125kYTD
$2.2MCAREER
33 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWLWLL
Holt B.
6-3 6-4
Bolt A.
Holt B.
662
Bolt A.
340

Brandon Holt defeated Alex Bolt 6-3 6-4 in the Busan CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Alex Bolt came in ranked #166, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

  • Match story: Brandon Holt closed it out in two sets, 6–3 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Holt B.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Bolt A.

Bolt A.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Holt B.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Holt B.Bolt A.
1st serve in·Even
68%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
54%
Service points won·Even
64%
65%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Even
62%
65%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.5
7.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
0.9
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (75 vs 86). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Holt B.Bolt A.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
58
44
Break points saved·Slight edge
85
93
Break points won·Clear edge
31
7
Deciding sets·Dominant
79
46
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
69
83

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Holt B.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Bolt A.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Injury return: 49 days (−1.0)
Form & Matchup
4.4Hard Elo 1507
Surface ELO
5.6+34 Hard Elo edge
4.1Overall Elo 1537
ELO gap
5.9Overall Elo 1588
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.2
Surface form
4.5
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.6
Minutes 14d
7.0
Prev. match
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Atmane T.[8]
Walton A.[1]
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Walton A.[1]
Kubler J.
7-666-737-5
Atmane T.[8]
Holt B.[3]
7-653-66-3
Quarter-finals
Walton A.[1]
Uchiyama Y.[5]
7-55-76-3
Kubler J.
Chung H.
6-26-4
Holt B.[3]
Hsu Y.
6-26-2
Atmane T.[8]
Simakin I.
6-41-66-3
R16
Chung H.
Tu L.[6]
3-66-36-4
Uchiyama Y.[5]
Kwon S.
6-11-67-61
Walton A.[1]
Shimizu Y.
6-27-64
Hsu Y.
Sin S.
6-26-2
Holt B.[3]
Bolt A.
6-36-4
Atmane T.[8]
Jasika O.
6-32-66-4
Simakin I.
Svajda Z.
7-636-1
Kubler J.
Campana Lee G.
6-36-0
R32
Chung H.
Ruusuvuori E.
6-26-4
Tu L.[6]
Sharipov M.
6-23-66-1
Atmane T.[8]
Mccabe J.
7-647-62
Shimizu Y.
Shimabukuro S.
6-36-1
Walton A.[1]
Noguchi R.
6-06-2
Campana Lee G.
Schoolkate T.[4]
6-43-66-3
Hsu Y.
Trotter J.[7]
6-36-3
Bolt A.
Watanuki Y.
6-37-64
Holt B.[3]
Lestienne C.
1-67-626-4
Jasika O.
Durasovic V.
0-66-36-2
Uchiyama Y.[5]
Rosenkranz M.
7-646-3
Svajda Z.
Eubanks C.[2]
3-67-636-0
Kwon S.
Escoffier A.
3-66-17-5
Simakin I.
Kachmazov A.
6-776-46-3
Kubler J.
Sakamoto R.
7-56-4
Sin S.
Monday J.
6-36-4