Tibo Colson vs Abdoulaziz Bationo — Abidjan 1 CH Round of 32

Abidjan 1 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
BEL
Tibo Colson
#482ATP
1409ELO
1352Hard ELO
25 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWWWWWWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 14 April 2025
hard
CIV
Abdoulaziz Bationo
25 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
L
Colson T.
6-3 6-4
Bationo A.
Colson T.
662
Bationo A.
340

Tibo Colson defeated Abdoulaziz Bationo 6-3 6-4 in the Abidjan 1 CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Tibo Colson closed it out in two sets, 6–3 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Colson T.serving94% hold

wins 73% of points on serve vs Bationo A.

Bationo A.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Colson T.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. Small sample — read as indicative. About

Statistics

This season
Colson T.Bationo A.
1st serve in·Clear edge
59%
74%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
78%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
53%
Service points won·Slight edge
67%
62%
Return points won·Clear edge
36%
15%
Break points saved·Even
65%
67%
Aces / match·Dominant
11.0
3.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.7
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (33 vs 1). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Colson T.
3.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 168 days (−1.5)
Bationo A.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.5
Surface form
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Jones M.
Berankis R.[5]
6-34-66-4
Semi-finals
Berankis R.[5]
Colson T.
7-646-746-4
Jones M.
Bax F.
6-756-46-4
Quarter-finals
Bax F.
Hussey G.
7-656-4
Berankis R.[5]
Geerts M.[3]
6-44-67-65
Colson T.
Bertrand R.[2]
6-36-4
Jones M.
Glinka D.
6-46-2
R16
Bax F.
Dougaz A.[1]
6-46-4
Hussey G.
Henning P.[8]
6-46-3
Jones M.
Chidekh C.[4]
6-36-2
Geerts M.[3]
Potenza L.
2-67-656-2
Berankis R.[5]
Bakshi A.
7-676-2
Colson T.
Kirkin E.[6]
6-37-64
Bertrand R.[2]
Ursu V.
6-26-0
Glinka D.
Baadi T.
7-57-61
R32
Bax F.
Singh K.
6-46-4
Potenza L.
Erel Y.
6-736-36-4
Jones M.
Van Wyk K.
7-52-67-64
Dougaz A.[1]
Samuel T.
6-36-4
Hussey G.
Kellovsky D.
7-654-66-1
Henning P.[8]
Poullain L.
7-656-3
Chidekh C.[4]
Palan D.
6-36-2
Glinka D.
Paire B.
6-45-76-4
Bakshi A.
Kivattsev K.
1-66-37-5
Geerts M.[3]
Kalyanpur A.
6-16-3
Kirkin E.[6]
Ouakaa A.
7-57-5
Colson T.
Bationo A.
6-36-4
Bertrand R.[2]
Compagnucci T.
6-23-66-3
Ursu V.
Echargui M.
6-13-66-3
Baadi T.
Coulibaly E.[7]
7-54-66-4
Berankis R.[5]
Shah A.
3-66-26-4