Terence Atmane vs Adam Walton — Busan CH Final

Busan CH · CHALLENGER · Final
Terence Atmane
FRA8
Terence Atmane
#50ATP
1704ELO
1674Hard ELO
$707kYTD
$2.2MCAREER
24 yrs · 193 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 14 April 2025
hard
Adam Walton
AUS1
Adam Walton
#79ATP
1703ELO
1669Hard ELO
$499kYTD
$2.3MCAREER
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLLWWW
Atmane T.
6-3 6-4
Walton A.
Atmane T.
662
Walton A.
340

Terence Atmane defeated Adam Walton 6-3 6-4 in the Busan CH final on hard. The result followed the form book — Terence Atmane came in ranked #50, leading the head-to-head 1–0. Terence Atmane extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-10-02Shanghai MastersQ2hardTerence Atmane6-7(4) 6-4 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Atmane T.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Walton A.

Walton A.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Atmane T.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Atmane T.Walton A.
36
Serve
35
27
Return
27

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Atmane T.Walton A.
1st serve in·Even
60%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
53%
Service points won·Even
65%
65%
Return points won·Even
35%
36%
Break points saved·Even
62%
62%
Aces / match·Slight edge
7.6
6.8
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.5
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (85 vs 108). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Atmane T.Walton A.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
56
65
Break points saved·Even
95
95
Break points won·Slight edge
25
20
Deciding sets·Dominant
54
95
Tiebreaks·Dominant
96
70

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Atmane T.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Walton A.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.8+5 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.2Hard Elo 1669
6.0Overall Elo 1704
ELO gap
4.0Overall Elo 1703
10.0
H2H
0.0
2.6
Surface form
6.2
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.1
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Atmane T.Walton A.
Freshness·Dominant
95
46

Atmane T.: 12 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Walton A.: 1 day rest · 5 matches, 122 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Atmane T.[8]
Walton A.[1]
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Walton A.[1]
Kubler J.
7-666-737-5
Atmane T.[8]
Holt B.[3]
7-653-66-3
Quarter-finals
Walton A.[1]
Uchiyama Y.[5]
7-55-76-3
Kubler J.
Chung H.
6-26-4
Holt B.[3]
Hsu Y.
6-26-2
Atmane T.[8]
Simakin I.
6-41-66-3
R16
Chung H.
Tu L.[6]
3-66-36-4
Uchiyama Y.[5]
Kwon S.
6-11-67-61
Walton A.[1]
Shimizu Y.
6-27-64
Hsu Y.
Sin S.
6-26-2
Holt B.[3]
Bolt A.
6-36-4
Atmane T.[8]
Jasika O.
6-32-66-4
Simakin I.
Svajda Z.
7-636-1
Kubler J.
Campana Lee G.
6-36-0
R32
Chung H.
Ruusuvuori E.
6-26-4
Tu L.[6]
Sharipov M.
6-23-66-1
Atmane T.[8]
Mccabe J.
7-647-62
Shimizu Y.
Shimabukuro S.
6-36-1
Walton A.[1]
Noguchi R.
6-06-2
Campana Lee G.
Schoolkate T.[4]
6-43-66-3
Hsu Y.
Trotter J.[7]
6-36-3
Bolt A.
Watanuki Y.
6-37-64
Holt B.[3]
Lestienne C.
1-67-626-4
Jasika O.
Durasovic V.
0-66-36-2
Uchiyama Y.[5]
Rosenkranz M.
7-646-3
Svajda Z.
Eubanks C.[2]
3-67-636-0
Kwon S.
Escoffier A.
3-66-17-5
Simakin I.
Kachmazov A.
6-776-46-3
Kubler J.
Sakamoto R.
7-56-4
Sin S.
Monday J.
6-36-4