Terence Atmane vs Omar Jasika — Busan CH Round of 16

Busan CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Terence Atmane
FRA8
Terence Atmane
#50ATP
1704ELO
1674Hard ELO
$707kYTD
$2.2MCAREER
24 yrs · 193 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 14 April 2025
hard
AUS
Omar Jasika
#528ATP
1296ELO
1272Hard ELO
29 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLLL
Atmane T.
6-3 2-6 6-4
Jasika O.
Atmane T.
6262
Jasika O.
3641

Terence Atmane defeated Omar Jasika 6-3 2-6 6-4 in the Busan CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Terence Atmane came in ranked #50, leading the head-to-head 1–0. Terence Atmane extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Terence Atmane closed it out in three sets, 6–3 2–6 6–4.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-08-07Cincinnati MastersQ1hardTerence Atmane7-5 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Atmane T.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Jasika O.

Jasika O.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Atmane T.

Serve advantage — Atmane T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Atmane T.Jasika O.
36
Serve
—
27
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Atmane T.Jasika O.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
66%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
63%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
65%
58%
Return points won·Even
35%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
63%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.6
2.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.5
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (85 vs 64). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Atmane T.Jasika O.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
56
0
Break points saved·Dominant
95
47
Break points won·Clear edge
25
13
Deciding sets·Dominant
54
13
Tiebreaks·Dominant
96
1

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Atmane T.
7.2
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Jasika O.
3.2
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 70 days (−1.2)
Form & Matchup
10.0+402 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.0Hard Elo 1272
10.0Overall Elo 1704
ELO gap
0.0Overall Elo 1296
10.0
H2H
0.0
2.6
Surface form
6.5
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Atmane T.Jasika O.
Freshness·
95
—

Atmane T.: 12 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Atmane T.[8]
Walton A.[1]
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Walton A.[1]
Kubler J.
7-666-737-5
Atmane T.[8]
Holt B.[3]
7-653-66-3
Quarter-finals
Walton A.[1]
Uchiyama Y.[5]
7-55-76-3
Kubler J.
Chung H.
6-26-4
Holt B.[3]
Hsu Y.
6-26-2
Atmane T.[8]
Simakin I.
6-41-66-3
R16
Chung H.
Tu L.[6]
3-66-36-4
Uchiyama Y.[5]
Kwon S.
6-11-67-61
Walton A.[1]
Shimizu Y.
6-27-64
Hsu Y.
Sin S.
6-26-2
Holt B.[3]
Bolt A.
6-36-4
Atmane T.[8]
Jasika O.
6-32-66-4
Simakin I.
Svajda Z.
7-636-1
Kubler J.
Campana Lee G.
6-36-0
R32
Chung H.
Ruusuvuori E.
6-26-4
Tu L.[6]
Sharipov M.
6-23-66-1
Atmane T.[8]
Mccabe J.
7-647-62
Shimizu Y.
Shimabukuro S.
6-36-1
Walton A.[1]
Noguchi R.
6-06-2
Campana Lee G.
Schoolkate T.[4]
6-43-66-3
Hsu Y.
Trotter J.[7]
6-36-3
Bolt A.
Watanuki Y.
6-37-64
Holt B.[3]
Lestienne C.
1-67-626-4
Jasika O.
Durasovic V.
0-66-36-2
Uchiyama Y.[5]
Rosenkranz M.
7-646-3
Svajda Z.
Eubanks C.[2]
3-67-636-0
Kwon S.
Escoffier A.
3-66-17-5
Simakin I.
Kachmazov A.
6-776-46-3
Kubler J.
Sakamoto R.
7-56-4
Sin S.
Monday J.
6-36-4