Terence Atmane vs Brandon Holt — Busan CH Semi-final

Busan CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Terence Atmane
FRA8
Terence Atmane
#50ATP
1704ELO
1674Hard ELO
$707kYTD
$2.2MCAREER
24 yrs · 193 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 14 April 2025
hard
USA3
Brandon Holt
#657ATP
1537ELO
1507Hard ELO
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLWW
Atmane T.
7-6 3-6 6-3
Holt B.
Atmane T.
77362
Holt B.
65631

Terence Atmane defeated Brandon Holt 7-6 3-6 6-3 in the Busan CH semi-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Terence Atmane came in ranked #50. Terence Atmane claimed a first win over Brandon Holt in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Terence Atmane closed it out in three sets, 7–6 3–6 6–3.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-02-19Los CabosQ1hardBrandon Holt6-4 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Atmane T.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Holt B.

Holt B.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Atmane T.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Atmane T.Holt B.
36
Serve
—
27
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Atmane T.Holt B.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
68%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
53%
Service points won·Even
65%
64%
Return points won·Even
35%
38%
Break points saved·Even
62%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
7.6
5.5
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.5
0.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (85 vs 75). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Atmane T.Holt B.
Clutch Rating·Even
56
58
Break points saved·Slight edge
95
85
Break points won·Slight edge
25
31
Deciding sets·Dominant
54
79
Tiebreaks·Dominant
96
69

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Atmane T.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Holt B.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.3+166 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.7Hard Elo 1507
7.6Overall Elo 1704
ELO gap
2.4Overall Elo 1537
0.0
H2H
10.0
2.6
Surface form
5.2
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.6
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Atmane T.Holt B.
Freshness·
95
—

Atmane T.: 12 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Atmane T.[8]
Walton A.[1]
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Walton A.[1]
Kubler J.
7-666-737-5
Atmane T.[8]
Holt B.[3]
7-653-66-3
Quarter-finals
Walton A.[1]
Uchiyama Y.[5]
7-55-76-3
Kubler J.
Chung H.
6-26-4
Holt B.[3]
Hsu Y.
6-26-2
Atmane T.[8]
Simakin I.
6-41-66-3
R16
Chung H.
Tu L.[6]
3-66-36-4
Uchiyama Y.[5]
Kwon S.
6-11-67-61
Walton A.[1]
Shimizu Y.
6-27-64
Hsu Y.
Sin S.
6-26-2
Holt B.[3]
Bolt A.
6-36-4
Atmane T.[8]
Jasika O.
6-32-66-4
Simakin I.
Svajda Z.
7-636-1
Kubler J.
Campana Lee G.
6-36-0
R32
Chung H.
Ruusuvuori E.
6-26-4
Tu L.[6]
Sharipov M.
6-23-66-1
Atmane T.[8]
Mccabe J.
7-647-62
Shimizu Y.
Shimabukuro S.
6-36-1
Walton A.[1]
Noguchi R.
6-06-2
Campana Lee G.
Schoolkate T.[4]
6-43-66-3
Hsu Y.
Trotter J.[7]
6-36-3
Bolt A.
Watanuki Y.
6-37-64
Holt B.[3]
Lestienne C.
1-67-626-4
Jasika O.
Durasovic V.
0-66-36-2
Uchiyama Y.[5]
Rosenkranz M.
7-646-3
Svajda Z.
Eubanks C.[2]
3-67-636-0
Kwon S.
Escoffier A.
3-66-17-5
Simakin I.
Kachmazov A.
6-776-46-3
Kubler J.
Sakamoto R.
7-56-4
Sin S.
Monday J.
6-36-4