Federico Agustin Gomez vs Filip Cristian Jianu — Sarasota CH Quarter-final

Sarasota CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
ARG2
Federico Agustin Gomez
#209ATP
1445ELO
1410Clay ELO
$29kYTD
$680kCAREER
29 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWLLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 7 April 2025
clay
Filip Cristian Jianu
ROU
Filip Cristian Jianu
#282ATP
1387ELO
1362Clay ELO
24 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
Gomez F.
6-4 6-0
Jianu F.
Gomez F.
662
Jianu F.
400

Federico Agustin Gomez defeated Filip Cristian Jianu 6-4 6-0 in the Sarasota CH quarter-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Federico Agustin Gomez came in ranked #209, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gomez F.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Jianu F.

Jianu F.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Gomez F.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gomez F.Jianu F.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
68%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
69%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
61%
60%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Even
58%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.3
1.7
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.6
1.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (72 vs 70). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gomez F.Jianu F.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
36
16
Break points saved·Dominant
82
55
Break points won·Dominant
18
52
Deciding sets·Dominant
62
13
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
16
1

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gomez F.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Jianu F.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.2+48 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.8Clay Elo 1362
5.2Overall Elo 1445
ELO gap
4.8Overall Elo 1387
5.4No prior meetings
H2H
4.6
4.1
Surface form
5.0
0.0Lost last 8
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.4
Minutes 14d
5.5
7.0
3-set count
0.0
6.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Gomez F.Jianu F.
Freshness·Dominant
52
100

Gomez F.: 1 day rest · 4 matches, 111 games (7d) · Jianu F.: 21 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Nava E.[5]
Draxl L.[7]
6-27-62
Semi-finals
Nava E.[5]
Spizzirri E.[1]
7-666-4
Draxl L.[7]
Gomez F.[2]
3-66-46-0
Quarter-finals
Draxl L.[7]
Andrade A.
7-57-64
Spizzirri E.[1]
Blancaneaux G.
6-46-4
Nava E.[5]
Barrios Vera T.[4]
7-57-63
Gomez F.[2]
Jianu F.
6-46-0
R16
Spizzirri E.[1]
Robertson C.
7-616-1
Blancaneaux G.
Erhard M.
6-46-3
Nava E.[5]
Boitan G.
6-36-2
Andrade A.
Krueger M.[3]
7-56-4
Jianu F.
Lajal M.
6-36-766-3
Gomez F.[2]
Montes De La Torre I.
6-07-64
Draxl L.[7]
Maloney P.
4-66-46-0
Barrios Vera T.[4]
Mmoh M.
4-66-36-2
R32
Spizzirri E.[1]
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
7-676-1
Barrios Vera T.[4]
Olivieri G.
6-36-3
Boitan G.
Zink T.
6-47-5
Nava E.[5]
Rodesch C.
6-46-4
Maloney P.
Damm M.
1-66-37-5
Andrade A.
Prado Angelo J.
7-636-1
Jianu F.
Mena F.[8]
4-66-47-5
Lajal M.
Wu T.
6-737-56-4
Blancaneaux G.
Denolly C.
6-27-5
Mmoh M.
Dutra Da Silva D.
6-36-3
Robertson C.
Sell K.
4-4
Krueger M.[3]
Schwaerzler J.
7-627-65
Draxl L.[7]
Bueno G.
7-56-4
Montes De La Torre I.
Vallejo A.
6-46-2
Gomez F.[2]
Johns G.
6-46-1
Erhard M.
Cassone M.
6-46-0