Emilio Nava vs Liam Draxl — Sarasota CH Final

Sarasota CH · CHALLENGER · Final
Emilio Nava
USA5
Emilio Nava
#91ATP
1704ELO
1686Clay ELO
$533kYTD
$2.1MCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 7 April 2025
clay
Liam Draxl
CAN7
Liam Draxl
#223ATP
1592ELO
1499Clay ELO
$201kYTD
$642kCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWWW
Nava E.
6-2 7-6
Draxl L.
Nava E.
6772
Draxl L.
2620

Emilio Nava defeated Liam Draxl 6-2 7-6 in the Sarasota CH final on clay. The result followed the form book — Emilio Nava came in ranked #91.

Key context

  • Match story: Emilio Nava closed it out in two sets, 6–2 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nava E.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Draxl L.

Draxl L.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Nava E.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Nava E.Draxl L.
23
Serve
—
3
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Nava E.Draxl L.
1st serve in·Even
63%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
48%
Service points won·Even
65%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.6
4.2
Double faults / match·Even
3.0
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (120 vs 108). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nava E.Draxl L.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
52
66
Break points saved·Slight edge
94
83
Break points won·Clear edge
17
36
Deciding sets·Slight edge
89
94
Tiebreaks·Dominant
23
75

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Nava E.
8.0
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Draxl L.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.0+187 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.0Clay Elo 1499
6.3Overall Elo 1704
ELO gap
3.7Overall Elo 1592
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
10.0
Surface form
6.6
10.011-match win streak
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.0
Minutes 14d
8.4
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Nava E.Draxl L.
Freshness·Even
96
98

Nava E.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Draxl L.: 12 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Nava E.[5]
Draxl L.[7]
6-27-62
Semi-finals
Nava E.[5]
Spizzirri E.[1]
7-666-4
Draxl L.[7]
Gomez F.[2]
3-66-46-0
Quarter-finals
Draxl L.[7]
Andrade A.
7-57-64
Spizzirri E.[1]
Blancaneaux G.
6-46-4
Nava E.[5]
Barrios Vera T.[4]
7-57-63
Gomez F.[2]
Jianu F.
6-46-0
R16
Spizzirri E.[1]
Robertson C.
7-616-1
Blancaneaux G.
Erhard M.
6-46-3
Nava E.[5]
Boitan G.
6-36-2
Andrade A.
Krueger M.[3]
7-56-4
Jianu F.
Lajal M.
6-36-766-3
Gomez F.[2]
Montes De La Torre I.
6-07-64
Draxl L.[7]
Maloney P.
4-66-46-0
Barrios Vera T.[4]
Mmoh M.
4-66-36-2
R32
Spizzirri E.[1]
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
7-676-1
Barrios Vera T.[4]
Olivieri G.
6-36-3
Boitan G.
Zink T.
6-47-5
Nava E.[5]
Rodesch C.
6-46-4
Maloney P.
Damm M.
1-66-37-5
Andrade A.
Prado Angelo J.
7-636-1
Jianu F.
Mena F.[8]
4-66-47-5
Lajal M.
Wu T.
6-737-56-4
Blancaneaux G.
Denolly C.
6-27-5
Mmoh M.
Dutra Da Silva D.
6-36-3
Robertson C.
Sell K.
4-4
Krueger M.[3]
Schwaerzler J.
7-627-65
Draxl L.[7]
Bueno G.
7-56-4
Montes De La Torre I.
Vallejo A.
6-46-2
Gomez F.[2]
Johns G.
6-46-1
Erhard M.
Cassone M.
6-46-0