Liam Draxl vs Federico Agustin Gomez — Sarasota CH Semi-final

Sarasota CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Liam Draxl
CAN7
Liam Draxl
#223ATP
1592ELO
1499Clay ELO
$201kYTD
$642kCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 7 April 2025
clay
ARG2
Federico Agustin Gomez
#209ATP
1445ELO
1410Clay ELO
$29kYTD
$680kCAREER
29 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWLLLLLW
Draxl L.
3-6 6-4 6-0
Gomez F.
Draxl L.
3662
Gomez F.
6401

Liam Draxl defeated Federico Agustin Gomez 3-6 6-4 6-0 in the Sarasota CH semi-final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Federico Agustin Gomez came in ranked #209, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Draxl L.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Gomez F.

Gomez F.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Draxl L.

Serve advantage — Draxl L.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Draxl L.Gomez F.
1st serve in·Slight edge
66%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
61%
Return points won·Even
40%
38%
Break points saved·Even
60%
58%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.2
5.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.3
4.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (108 vs 72). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Draxl L.Gomez F.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
66
36
Break points saved·Even
83
82
Break points won·Clear edge
36
18
Deciding sets·Dominant
94
62
Tiebreaks·Dominant
75
16

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Draxl L.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Gomez F.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.1+89 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.9Clay Elo 1410
6.9Overall Elo 1592
ELO gap
3.1Overall Elo 1445
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.6
Surface form
4.1
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 8
Fatigue & Travel
8.4
Minutes 14d
8.4
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Draxl L.Gomez F.
Freshness·Dominant
98
59

Draxl L.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Gomez F.: 2 days rest · 4 matches, 111 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Nava E.[5]
Draxl L.[7]
6-27-62
Semi-finals
Nava E.[5]
Spizzirri E.[1]
7-666-4
Draxl L.[7]
Gomez F.[2]
3-66-46-0
Quarter-finals
Draxl L.[7]
Andrade A.
7-57-64
Spizzirri E.[1]
Blancaneaux G.
6-46-4
Nava E.[5]
Barrios Vera T.[4]
7-57-63
Gomez F.[2]
Jianu F.
6-46-0
R16
Spizzirri E.[1]
Robertson C.
7-616-1
Blancaneaux G.
Erhard M.
6-46-3
Nava E.[5]
Boitan G.
6-36-2
Andrade A.
Krueger M.[3]
7-56-4
Jianu F.
Lajal M.
6-36-766-3
Gomez F.[2]
Montes De La Torre I.
6-07-64
Draxl L.[7]
Maloney P.
4-66-46-0
Barrios Vera T.[4]
Mmoh M.
4-66-36-2
R32
Spizzirri E.[1]
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
7-676-1
Barrios Vera T.[4]
Olivieri G.
6-36-3
Boitan G.
Zink T.
6-47-5
Nava E.[5]
Rodesch C.
6-46-4
Maloney P.
Damm M.
1-66-37-5
Andrade A.
Prado Angelo J.
7-636-1
Jianu F.
Mena F.[8]
4-66-47-5
Lajal M.
Wu T.
6-737-56-4
Blancaneaux G.
Denolly C.
6-27-5
Mmoh M.
Dutra Da Silva D.
6-36-3
Robertson C.
Sell K.
4-4
Krueger M.[3]
Schwaerzler J.
7-627-65
Draxl L.[7]
Bueno G.
7-56-4
Montes De La Torre I.
Vallejo A.
6-46-2
Gomez F.[2]
Johns G.
6-46-1
Erhard M.
Cassone M.
6-46-0