Adam Walton vs Michael Mmoh — Houston Round of 32

Houston · ATP · Round of 32
Adam Walton
AUS
Adam Walton
#79ATP
1703ELO
1543Clay ELO
$499kYTD
$2.3MCAREER
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 31 March 2025
clay
Michael Mmoh
USA
Michael Mmoh
#188ATP
1613ELO
1508Clay ELO
$85kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWWWL
Walton A.
6-3 7-6
Mmoh M.
Walton A.
6772
Mmoh M.
3650

Adam Walton defeated Michael Mmoh 6-3 7-6 in the Houston round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Adam Walton came in ranked #79, leading the head-to-head 1–0. Adam Walton extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Adam Walton closed it out in two sets, 6–3 7–6.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-03-05Indian Wells MastersQ2hardAdam Walton6-4 2-6 6-1

Serve vs return

This season
Walton A.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Mmoh M.

Mmoh M.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Walton A.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Walton A.Mmoh M.
1st serve in·Even
63%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
72%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
53%
46%
Service points won·Even
65%
62%
Return points won·Even
36%
40%
Break points saved·Even
62%
59%
Aces / match·Even
6.7
6.2
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.0
4.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (108 vs 66). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Walton A.Mmoh M.
Clutch Rating·Even
65
66
Break points saved·Even
95
91
Break points won·Slight edge
20
31
Deciding sets·Slight edge
95
90
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
70
77

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Walton A.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Mmoh M.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.0+35 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
5.0Clay Elo 1508
5.7Overall Elo 1703
ELO gap
4.3Overall Elo 1613
5.0
H2H
5.0
Surface form
3.2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
5.3
Minutes 14d
9.1
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
7.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Walton A.Mmoh M.
Freshness·Dominant
46
94

Walton A.: 1 day rest · 5 matches, 122 games (7d) · Mmoh M.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Brooksby J.
Tiafoe F.[2]
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Tiafoe F.[2]
Nakashima B.[4]
6-47-63
Brooksby J.
Paul T.[1]
7-653-67-66
Quarter-finals
Paul T.[1]
Smith C.
6-17-61
Tiafoe F.[2]
Michelsen A.[5]
7-56-1
Nakashima B.[4]
Eubanks C.
6-46-4
Brooksby J.
Kovacevic A.
2-66-36-4
R16
Eubanks C.
Nishikori K.[8]
6-10-0
Smith C.
Quinn E.
6-36-4
Kovacevic A.
Denolly C.
6-36-3
Nakashima B.[4]
Mcdonald M.
6-17-5
Michelsen A.[5]
Mannarino A.
6-706-46-2
Tiafoe F.[2]
Walton A.
7-56-3
Brooksby J.
Tabilo A.[3]
3-66-47-66
Paul T.[1]
Garin C.
2-66-27-65
R32
Mannarino A.
Hanfmann Y.
7-656-3
Denolly C.
Holt B.
7-677-68
Smith C.
Duckworth J.
6-26-2
Quinn E.
Thompson J.[6]
4-66-46-3
Nishikori K.[8]
Krueger M.
6-46-2
Mcdonald M.
Galan D.
6-26-736-4
Michelsen A.[5]
Tien L.
6-46-2
Walton A.
Mmoh M.
6-37-65
Eubanks C.
Hijikata R.
6-24-66-3
Kovacevic A.
Etcheverry T.[7]
6-36-4
Garin C.
Ritschard A.
6-36-4
Brooksby J.
Daniel T.
6-46-4