Lauren Davis vs Jamie Loeb — Charleston Round of 64

Charleston · WTA · Round of 64
USA
Lauren Davis
#1383WTA
32 yrs · 157 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 31 March 2025
clay
USA
Jamie Loeb
#1136WTA
31 yrs · 168 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWWLL
Davis L.
3-6 6-1 6-3
Loeb J.
Davis L.
3662
Loeb J.
6131

Lauren Davis defeated Jamie Loeb 3-6 6-1 6-3 in the Charleston round of 64 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Davis L.serving60% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Loeb J.

Loeb J.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Davis L.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Davis L.Loeb J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
55%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
59%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
44%
43%
Service points won·Even
54%
55%
Return points won·Even
41%
44%
Break points saved·Even
51%
53%
Aces / match·Slight edge
1.5
2.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.6
3.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (18 vs 26). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Davis L.Loeb J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
51
0
Break points saved·Slight edge
26
16
Break points won·Dominant
79
45
Deciding sets·Dominant
86
6
Tiebreaks·
82
—

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Davis L.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Loeb J.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.2
Surface form
3.2
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.6
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
7.0
6.0
Prev. match
6.8
Country comfort
4.0
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
24°CDrizzle
Wind 11 km/hHumidity 68%

Draw

Final
Pegula J.[1]
Kenin S.
6-37-5
Semi-finals
Kenin S.
Anisimova A.[8]
5-2
Pegula J.[1]
Alexandrova E.[9]
6-22-67-5
Quarter-finals
Pegula J.[1]
Collins D.[7]
1-66-36-0
Kenin S.
Kalinskaya A.[14]
6-46-3
Alexandrova E.[9]
Zheng Q.[3]
6-16-4
Anisimova A.[8]
Navarro E.[4]
7-57-61
R16
Kenin S.
Kasatkina D.[5]
6-37-67
Kalinskaya A.[14]
Keys M.[2]
6-26-4
Navarro E.[4]
Krueger A.[15]
4-66-46-2
Anisimova A.[8]
Putintseva Y.[10]
6-46-4
Collins D.[7]
Ostapenko J.[11]
7-56-3
Pegula J.[1]
Tomljanovic A.
6-36-2
Alexandrova E.[9]
Shnaider D.[6]
6-26-1
Zheng Q.[3]
Mertens E.[13]
6-33-66-3
R32
Zheng Q.[3]
Sakkari M.
6-46-1
Krueger A.[15]
Volynets K.
6-37-64
Navarro E.[4]
Baptiste H.
6-46-3
Kasatkina D.[5]
Davis L.
6-16-1
Kenin S.
Bencic B.[17]
6-06-3
Tomljanovic A.
Stearns P.[16]
6-16-4
Collins D.[7]
Montgomery R.
6-36-1
Shnaider D.[6]
Kudermetova P.
6-36-2
Anisimova A.[8]
Kudermetova V.
6-26-2
Mertens E.[13]
Gracheva V.
6-37-5
Pegula J.[1]
Shymanovich I.
6-06-3
Ostapenko J.[11]
Chirico L.
7-56-2
Alexandrova E.[9]
Li A.
6-36-0
Putintseva Y.[10]
Zhang S.
7-656-1
Kalinskaya A.[14]
Mcnally C.
6-16-4
Keys M.[2]
Dolehide C.
6-37-64
R64
Li A.
Blinkova A.
6-46-3
Kudermetova V.
Mateas M.
6-06-2
Chirico L.
Andreeva E.
6-43-66-4
Montgomery R.
Tomova V.
6-16-3
Sakkari M.
Stakusic M.
6-36-2
Gracheva V.
Dart H.
6-13-66-1
Mcnally C.
Kalinina A.
4-66-16-4
Dolehide C.
Cocciaretto E.
6-46-1
Baptiste H.
Gadecki O.
6-26-4
Zhang S.
Bronzetti L.
7-55-76-4
Shymanovich I.
Watson H.
7-686-4
Kudermetova P.
Begu I.
6-36-4
Tomljanovic A.
Okamura K.
3-66-16-2
Volynets K.
Sebov K.
6-06-0
Davis L.
Loeb J.
3-66-16-3
Kenin S.
Pera B.
6-36-4