Zsombor Piros vs Jan Choinski — Menorca CH Round of 16

Menorca CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Zsombor Piros
HUN
Zsombor Piros
#120ATP
1661ELO
1621Clay ELO
$145kYTD
$975kCAREER
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 31 March 2025
clay
Jan Choinski
GBR6
Jan Choinski
#75ATP
1686ELO
1652Clay ELO
$204kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
30 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWLWLWW
Piros Z.
6-4 6-4
Choinski J.
Piros Z.
662
Choinski J.
440

Zsombor Piros defeated Jan Choinski 6-4 6-4 in the Menorca CH round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Jan Choinski came in ranked #75.

Key context

  • Match story: Zsombor Piros edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Piros Z.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Choinski J.

Choinski J.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Piros Z.

Serve advantage — Piros Z.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Piros Z.Choinski J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
53%
Service points won·Even
63%
63%
Return points won·Slight edge
42%
37%
Break points saved·Even
63%
64%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.2
4.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.6
1.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (81 vs 97). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Piros Z.Choinski J.
Clutch Rating·Even
57
55
Break points saved·Slight edge
84
90
Break points won·Clear edge
32
20
Deciding sets·Even
85
88
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
48
41

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Piros Z.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Choinski J.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.1Clay Elo 1621
Surface ELO
3.9+32 Clay Elo edge
6.5Overall Elo 1661
ELO gap
3.5Overall Elo 1686
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.1
Surface form
3.7
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.3
Minutes 14d
9.2
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Piros Z.Choinski J.
Freshness·Even
48
49

Piros Z.: 1 day rest · 5 matches, 107 games (7d) · Choinski J.: 1 day rest · 5 matches, 113 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Gaubas V.[7]
Martin Tiffon P.
6-06-4
Semi-finals
Martin Tiffon P.
Neumayer L.
6-34-66-3
Gaubas V.[7]
Buse I.
6-44-66-4
Quarter-finals
Martin Tiffon P.
Taberner C.[5]
4-66-46-3
Neumayer L.
Moller E.[4]
6-36-4
Buse I.
Piros Z.
7-646-3
Gaubas V.[7]
Ofner S.[2]
7-626-2
R16
Buse I.
Rincon D.
6-06-1
Martin Tiffon P.
Ramos A.
6-16-4
Moller E.[4]
Hassan B.
7-676-0
Piros Z.
Choinski J.[6]
6-46-4
Gaubas V.[7]
Gea A.
7-56-3
Ofner S.[2]
Barranco Cosano J.
6-17-60
Taberner C.[5]
Merida Aguilar D.
3-67-56-0
Neumayer L.
Cachin P.
7-626-0
R32
Moller E.[4]
Alcala Gurri M.
6-36-3
Hassan B.
Alvarez Varona N.
7-616-3
Ofner S.[2]
Andreev A.
6-22-0
Martin Tiffon P.
Engel J.
6-43-66-3
Merida Aguilar D.
Hardt N.
6-736-46-2
Taberner C.[5]
Yevseyev D.
6-24-66-1
Choinski J.[6]
Roca Batalla O.
7-647-5
Piros Z.
Vavassori A.
5-76-36-1
Rincon D.
Coppejans K.
6-736-46-2
Buse I.
Cilic M.[3]
6-26-1
Neumayer L.
Virgili Berini F.
6-36-4
Cachin P.
Butvilas E.[8]
6-26-3
Gaubas V.[7]
Squire H.
6-07-65
Gea A.
Campana Lee G.
6-34-66-0
Ramos A.
Harris B.[1]
6-24-66-4
Barranco Cosano J.
Feldbausch K.
6-23-66-4